After reading the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) article by Lee Min-yung (李敏勇) on Feb. 19, I agree with his view that “because of the remnants of the Republic of China [ROC], the illusion of existence within another government’s system, Taiwan has yet to complete the construction of a sovereign independent state. Supporters of the ROC need to look at this plight.”
The ROC government-in-exile has occupied Taiwan for more than 60 years, resulting in great harm to Taiwanese.
The media have recently been discussing the so-called “1992 consensus,” the “1996 consensus,” a “constitutional consensus,” a “Taiwan consensus” and other political slogans. These are just slogans created to mislead the public. They do not help solve the issue of Taiwan’s sovereignty and independence.
Some people are also just using elections to gain power within the system. However, the existence of the privilege elected officials enjoy does not solve the issue, either. Taiwan is still trapped in the system of the ROC government-in-exile.
Thirteen years ago, in the article “Taiwanese Sovereignty, Independence and the Republic of China,” my late husband, C.C. Yang (楊基銓), concluded that “the only way is to clearly define the distinction between Taiwan and China — the clearer the better — and believe that if we do all these, Taiwan can gain the acceptance of all countries and emerge to become a truly sovereign and independent state.”
Over the years, I pondered why Taiwanese always want to struggle for power within the system. Why not use historical evidence and principles of international law to break away from the ROC government? Is it because of the selfishness of Taiwan’s political figures?
The recent incident of the Philippine government sending Taiwanese fraud suspects to China is the product of the system of the ROC government. If you don’t want to break away from the system, you can only blame yourself and not President Ma Ying-Jeou’s (馬英九) administration.
To save Taiwan from Chinese annexation, we should all recognize this fact and work on breaking away — as soon as possible — from this government-in-exile system.
Yang Liu Hsiu-hwa is chairman of the International Cultural Foundation.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS