After the Tunisians launched the “Jasmine Revolution,” Egypt became the second domino that collapsed. The moment protesters at Cairo’s Tahrir Square heard that Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak had tendered his resignation, they cheered excitedly: “Egypt is free!”
This revolution born out of street protests reaches beyond ethnicity, region, culture and religion, making it clear that that the pursuit of freedom and the will to oppose dictatorship are not exclusive to Western countries. They are truly universal values shared by all human beings.
Most political commentators around the world who are following events in North Africa and the Arab world have said that the public’s insistence on the pursuit of freedom is crucial to deciding whether or not this “fourth wave of democratization” will be successful and lasting.
Through his Twitter account, Chinese human rights lawyer Teng Biao (滕彪) congratulated the Egyptian people by quoting the ancient Greek historian Thucydides, who said: “The secret of happiness is freedom. The secret of freedom is courage.”
The question is why is it that the pursuit of freedom has clearly given the general public the courage required to take to the streets.
Perhaps the simplest explanation is that people have realized that the idea that sovereignty rests with the public means that a leader whose regime has not been approved through democratic procedures has no legitimacy.
That in its turn means that each citizen has the right to question the legitimacy of an unelected dictator. This is the reason the Libyan people remain resolute in their efforts to topple Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi, even though he has ordered a military crackdown and missile attacks against protesters.
Ultimately, Qaddafi will not be able to resist the massive wave of freedom sweepig the region. His only way out could well be to flee the country, as he has been deserted by friends and followers alike.
The enthusiasm with which people across the region welcome freedom also offers a lesson for Taiwan.
It tells us that we must stand clearly and firmly on the right side of history. We must not make the mistake of being seduced by China’s economic growth and convince ourselves that the Chinese Communist Party will stay in power forever.
In addition, the “Revolution 2.0” making itself felt in North Africa and the Arab world has highlighted the penetrative and potentially disruptive power of new technologies.
Although the time may not yet be ripe for China to embrace protests staged across the country by Internet users, the popular Chinese folk song Mo Li Hua (茉莉花), which is Chinese for “Jasmine blossom,” may yet become a symbol of the Chinese people’s hopes for a democratic revolution of their own.
As we witness the power of freedom, we must also realize that the further consolidation of democracy in Taiwan requires that we continue to move forward and not rest on our laurels.
In particular, Taiwanese must exercise both wisdom and courage when they cast their ballots in the legislative elections to be held at the end of this year or in the second half of next year and the upcoming presidential election. They must ask themselves who is more likely to work to further implement democratic values.
If we fail to do this, then we will have let down all those people who sacrificed so much and spent years fighting for our hard-won freedom.
Ku Chung-hwa is chairman of Citizen’s Congress Watch.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval