The determinatioN of the EU to strengthen its cooperation with Taiwan has never been as perceptible as these recent years. Indeed, aside from the fact that 18 EU member states have representative offices in Taipei despite the absence of diplomatic ties, the EU established a European Economic and Trade Office in Taipei in 2003 and an EU Center in 2009. Last month, the EU also included Taiwan on its Schengen visa-free list, a move considered by Taiwanese authorities as a “vote of confidence” from the union.
This confidence has also been expressed by the European Commission in the research area through its call for a larger participation of Taiwan in its 7th Framework Program for Research (FP7), regarded as the EU’s main instrument for funding research with a budget of more than 50 billion euros (US$67.8 billion) covering a period from 2007 to 2013.
To strengthen Taiwan’s involvement in the FP7, the European Commission and the National Science Council launched a Taiwan-National Contact Point (NCP) in September 2008 and a network of eight thematic NCPs — health, food and biotechnology, information and communication technologies (ICT), nanotechnology, energy, environment, humanities and security — last month to promote the FP7 locally and facilitate the participation of Taiwanese researchers in the international consortium built to respond to the EU research projects’ call.
Last year, Taiwan participated in 17 FP7 projects, notably in ICT, environment and health. In health, Taiwan was involved in projects on pandemic influenza, hospital safety and neglected virus. Besides the daily devotion of the Taiwanese NCPs and the fact that they are still in a learning process, there is more room for Taiwan’s participation considering the quality of its research. In comparison, South Korea has joined 32 FP7 projects and Japan 38, not to mention China’s involvement in 160 FP7 projects.
Expanding Taiwanese participation in EU projects also depends on Taiwanese researchers’ motivation to join the international consortium created to respond to FP7 calls for research proposals. In health research, for example, the incentives to join EU projects are manifest.
First, the EU offers a unique opportunity to join large-scale multilateral research partnership with all the benefits that consequent budget have in terms of health research capacities and that different research cultures bring in terms of innovation.
Second, while most Taiwanese health researchers look to the US or Japan for external funding, working with European researchers represents a “niche” for the most audacious of the young researchers and a crucial extension of the research network for the most experienced scientists. Besides, diversifying their financial resources is a guarantee of sustainability and quality.
Finally, Taiwanese and Europeans scientists share numerous health research interests, which make partnership between them indispensable to improve global health.
All these reasons are also valid for other areas covered by the FP7. Taiwanese researchers are considered valuable partners by European scientists and the EU is very supportive of their involvement in FP7 projects. Taiwanese scientists shouldn’t miss this opportunity because — to paraphrase well-known German writer, J.W Goethe — great researchers are “the ones who seize the moment.”
Vincent Rollet is the European affairs adviser, Yang Pan-chyr is principal investigator and Peter Chang, co-principal investigator for Taiwan EU Framework Program for Research, Health National Contact Point.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS