Saving biodiversity
When a Greenpeace activist was arrested for climbing onto a ship’s anchor cable to protest unsustainable fishing practices, the ship’s owner stated that activists “shouldn’t take such irrational action” (“Activist arrested for tuna protest,” Jan. 25, page 2).
Excuse me? The only behavior here that is irrational is to continue the unsustainable fishing practices that have led to severe overfishing of the seas and oceans, and ultimately threaten food security and thousands of jobs in the fishing industry. Overfishing of tuna, sharks and other sea life is directly responsible for the continuing decline and perhaps eventual collapse of the ocean’s fisheries, as has been well-documented in many scientific reports.
Asia’s relentless appetite for delicacies such as shark fins, is driving the imminent extinction of many species (“Taiwan is world’s fourth-largest shark catcher, report says,” Jan. 28, page 1).
This biodiversity crisis is accelerating, possibly leading to the extinction of species. The causes are well-known: Besides overfishing, they are habitat destruction, invasive species and pollution including global warming.
What are we to do? Are there any solutions or will we just have to accept that we will live in a vastly impoverished world with collapsed ecosystems?
It is time to shine the light on some of the good work done by the nation’s own biodiversity institute, the Endemic Species Research Institute. It has supported many projects to research the nation’s biodiversity, educate the public and support sustainable development.
For example, it supported an educational Web site with text and videos about the biodiversity crisis, as well as possible solutions. Together with National Taiwan University, it also runs a project that attempts to identify those areas of the country which are most valuable in terms of biodiversity, but have not been protected yet.
However, for this research to have any bearing on the real world, decision-makers must realize that the main causes of the biodiversity crisis mentioned above must be urgently addressed. While customers can reduce their impact by not consuming endangered species, what we also urgently need is national and international regulations that set sustainable harvesting limits for marine animals (“Just say no to shark’s fin,” Feb. 2, page 8).
Furthermore, biodiversity needs wild spaces to thrive. The recent plans by the government to build more gigantic industrial projects and dams to supply them with with water, besides having a negative impact on health and food security, displace animals because there is no space for them anymore as forests, wetlands and other natural habitats simply disappear (“Bird migration to Philippines falls sharply,” Jan. 26, page 5).
Therefore, calls for important habitats to be protected must be heeded to avert a biodiversity crisis in Taiwan, whether it be terrestrial or marine (“Environmentalists urge protection for Changhua wetland,” Jan. 26, page 3 and “Marine park mulled for southern Penghu islets,” Feb. 2, page 2). Our children will be thankful if we sustain the diversity of life.
Bruno Walther
Taipei
Spineless in Manila
I just want to interject a few comments on Philippine Vice President Jejomar Binay’s statement that Taiwan shouldn’t retaliate against poor Filipino workers in response to the deportation of Taiwanese suspects to China. (“Philippine VP says Filipinos shouldn’t bear Taipei’s anger,” Feb. 12, page 2).
A little advice for Binay: The next time Taiwanese suspects are up for deportation, send them to Taiwan instead of another country. Are Australian suspects in the Philippines deported to the UK instead of Australia? How about Taiwan deporting Filipino suspects to Spain instead?
Not only was no apology offered, but the “get over it, let’s get back to business as usual” attitude is appalling. If the employment of his poor countrymen is so important, then why offend one of the overseas employers of your poor countrymen?
If he cares so much about his poor countrymen, then why do his poor countrymen have to leave the Philippines and go to places such as Taiwan, the Middle East and the US to make a living?
Did the Philippine government receive any kickbacks from China to denigrate Taiwan or did they simply cave in because of a lack of a backbone? Taiwan deserves better and frankly, so do Filipinos.
Carl Chiang
Richmond, California
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
China’s recent aggressive military posture around Taiwan simply reflects the truth that China is a millennium behind, as Kobe City Councilor Norihiro Uehata has commented. While democratic countries work for peace, prosperity and progress, authoritarian countries such as Russia and China only care about territorial expansion, superpower status and world dominance, while their people suffer. Two millennia ago, the ancient Chinese philosopher Mencius (孟子) would have advised Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) that “people are the most important, state is lesser, and the ruler is the least important.” In fact, the reverse order is causing the great depression in China right now,
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
RSS