Saving biodiversity
When a Greenpeace activist was arrested for climbing onto a ship’s anchor cable to protest unsustainable fishing practices, the ship’s owner stated that activists “shouldn’t take such irrational action” (“Activist arrested for tuna protest,” Jan. 25, page 2).
Excuse me? The only behavior here that is irrational is to continue the unsustainable fishing practices that have led to severe overfishing of the seas and oceans, and ultimately threaten food security and thousands of jobs in the fishing industry. Overfishing of tuna, sharks and other sea life is directly responsible for the continuing decline and perhaps eventual collapse of the ocean’s fisheries, as has been well-documented in many scientific reports.
Asia’s relentless appetite for delicacies such as shark fins, is driving the imminent extinction of many species (“Taiwan is world’s fourth-largest shark catcher, report says,” Jan. 28, page 1).
This biodiversity crisis is accelerating, possibly leading to the extinction of species. The causes are well-known: Besides overfishing, they are habitat destruction, invasive species and pollution including global warming.
What are we to do? Are there any solutions or will we just have to accept that we will live in a vastly impoverished world with collapsed ecosystems?
It is time to shine the light on some of the good work done by the nation’s own biodiversity institute, the Endemic Species Research Institute. It has supported many projects to research the nation’s biodiversity, educate the public and support sustainable development.
For example, it supported an educational Web site with text and videos about the biodiversity crisis, as well as possible solutions. Together with National Taiwan University, it also runs a project that attempts to identify those areas of the country which are most valuable in terms of biodiversity, but have not been protected yet.
However, for this research to have any bearing on the real world, decision-makers must realize that the main causes of the biodiversity crisis mentioned above must be urgently addressed. While customers can reduce their impact by not consuming endangered species, what we also urgently need is national and international regulations that set sustainable harvesting limits for marine animals (“Just say no to shark’s fin,” Feb. 2, page 8).
Furthermore, biodiversity needs wild spaces to thrive. The recent plans by the government to build more gigantic industrial projects and dams to supply them with with water, besides having a negative impact on health and food security, displace animals because there is no space for them anymore as forests, wetlands and other natural habitats simply disappear (“Bird migration to Philippines falls sharply,” Jan. 26, page 5).
Therefore, calls for important habitats to be protected must be heeded to avert a biodiversity crisis in Taiwan, whether it be terrestrial or marine (“Environmentalists urge protection for Changhua wetland,” Jan. 26, page 3 and “Marine park mulled for southern Penghu islets,” Feb. 2, page 2). Our children will be thankful if we sustain the diversity of life.
Bruno Walther
Taipei
Spineless in Manila
I just want to interject a few comments on Philippine Vice President Jejomar Binay’s statement that Taiwan shouldn’t retaliate against poor Filipino workers in response to the deportation of Taiwanese suspects to China. (“Philippine VP says Filipinos shouldn’t bear Taipei’s anger,” Feb. 12, page 2).
A little advice for Binay: The next time Taiwanese suspects are up for deportation, send them to Taiwan instead of another country. Are Australian suspects in the Philippines deported to the UK instead of Australia? How about Taiwan deporting Filipino suspects to Spain instead?
Not only was no apology offered, but the “get over it, let’s get back to business as usual” attitude is appalling. If the employment of his poor countrymen is so important, then why offend one of the overseas employers of your poor countrymen?
If he cares so much about his poor countrymen, then why do his poor countrymen have to leave the Philippines and go to places such as Taiwan, the Middle East and the US to make a living?
Did the Philippine government receive any kickbacks from China to denigrate Taiwan or did they simply cave in because of a lack of a backbone? Taiwan deserves better and frankly, so do Filipinos.
Carl Chiang
Richmond, California
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS