Every time Ukraine is mentioned, most people think of Chernobyl and the Orange Revolution, but the country has a lot in common with Taiwan, making a closer look worthwhile.
Ukraine’s independence was not followed by a period of transitional justice; power remained with the Communist Party until the Orange Revolution in 2004. The main players in the revolution were former president Viktor Yushchenko, President Viktor Yanukovych and former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko.
Yushchenko and Tymoshenko belong to the country’s pro-Western faction. They both want Ukraine to distance itself from Russia and move closer to Europe, and to join both the EU and NATO. Their base is in western Ukraine, a strongly independent area built on small and medium-sized enterprises and with a small wealth gap.
Yanukovych has his support base in eastern Ukraine, where big industry and the very rich are concentrated, and where there is a big gap between rich and poor. This is also where the large Russian minority is concentrated.
In the 2004 presidential election, Yushchenko’s popularity was at a high, and when he joined hands with Tymoshenko, it soared higher still. Yanukovych, however, had the support of then-president Leonid Kuchma, so the two camps were evenly matched. In the run-off election, the sitting government was accused of rigging the vote and public anger forced a second vote. Yushchenko won the run-off, in the “Orange Revolution.”
Yushchenko’s first decision as president was to appoint Tymoshenko as his prime minister, but less than a year later the two split. Yushchenko’s popularity dropped because some of his confidantes were suspected of corruption, the economy faltered and Russia picked a fight over natural gas for political reasons. Thanks to this split in the reform camp, Yanukovych won a narrow victory over Tymoshenko in the presidential election in February last year.
Although Yanukovych said the goal was still to bring Ukraine into the EU, he also pledged to improve relations with Russia. An agreement was soon reached, giving Russia a 25-year extension on its lease of a naval base for its Black Sea fleet on the Crimean Peninsula. The condition for the extension was that Russia forego some benefits by offering Ukraine a 30 percent discount on natural gas over the next decade. During the parliamentary review of the agreement, the reform faction claimed the government was selling out the country’s sovereignty and trying to cover it up, causing parliament to break into fisticuffs.
Although Yanukovych supports freedom of expression, most TV stations in the country sensed in which direction the wind was blowing and threw their support behind him. In addition, the government began to purge the opposition and several members of the previous government were arrested or brought to court.
Ukraine and Taiwan are both experiencing far-reaching social divisions because they are neighbors with a large country with which they share a language and ethnicity. In Ukraine’s case, some want to distance the country from Russia and join the EU, and in Taiwan’s case, some want to distance themselves from the US and join China.
The extension of the Russian lease for the Black Sea port was made possible because Russia decided to forego some benefits, just as China did when it signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement. As the old regime was returned to power in both countries, they proceeded to attack officials of the previous government, strengthen their control over the media and break away from reformers. How these difficulties should be dealt with depends on the wisdom and choices of the public in each country.
Yang Shin-nan is professor emeritus of physics at National Taiwan University.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS