Monthly pension payments, national health insurance, an 18 percent interest rate: Describing this combination as “the best retirement system in the world” is a misnomer; it is not a retirement system — it is a tool to perpetuate class differences and oppress the public.
Commodity prices in Taiwan are lower than in Europe or North America. In terms of purchasing power, monthly retirement payments and national health insurance make military personnel, civil servants and teachers in Taiwan some of the most privileged groups in the world. The 18 percent interest rate is worth perhaps another NT$30,000 extra every month, which means a retired soldier, civil servant or teacher can earn anything from NT$60,000 to more than NT$100,000 per month. This is not retirement, it is an extortion racket.
A retired couple who bought their home a long time ago, whose children are now adults, and who can use the national health insurance in case of illness will not spend more than NT$20,000 to NT$30,000 a month on food, and pocket the remaining money. The 18 percent interest and the remaining retirement money will of course go to their children and grandchildren. That is why the children of military personnel, civil servants and teachers can study abroad, travel, accumulate wealth and buy a second home, all without having to work.
These pensioners live a leisurely life aimed at pursuing their own and their children and grandchildren’s interests. They have more time, energy and perseverance than anyone else when it comes to protecting the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) policies, economic interests and ideology.
It is hardly surprising that they are a willing part of the political apparatus that perpetuates the status of the KMT elite and its rule over Taiwan.
What is the difference between the people living off the 18 percent interest rate and the comfortable life that makes possible and the Mongolian rulers who were fed by the Chinese they also ruled?
We should feel sorry for all those poor people whose parents are not in the military or work as civil servants or teachers. Even if they’ve taken out a student loan to finish their university studies, they are still unlikely to earn more than NT$30,000 per month. They do not own their homes and although they earn less than half of what a retired soldier, civil servant or teacher receives, they have to pay rent and are expected to get married, have children and raise a family. Such people have problems making it from one day to the next and of course they have no time to pay attention to the public interest or politics. They must accept that they are typical examples of a ruled and oppressed class.
The way in which the KMT elite uses the perks it gives to military personnel, civil servants and teachers to economically suppress Taiwanese can only be described as the oppression of a whole nation. The proportion of ‘Mainlanders” that enjoy the 18 percent preferential interest rate is many times larger than the proportion of such people in the Hoklo, Hakka or Aboriginal ethnic groups. That is why the 18 percent preferential interest rate, in addition to consolidating the perpetuation of the ruling class, is also a way for that class and the KMT’s ruling clique to oppress everyone else.
The 18 percent interest rate is the perfect reason for a revolution. It is also the perfect reason to hold a referendum.
If the Democratic Progressive Party continues to do no more than talk about the “reform” of this system and pretends not to hear calls for abolition of the preferential interest rate, that would be reason enough to establish a new pro-Taiwan political party.
Lin Chia is an independent commentator.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS