The government is making rampant use of embedded marketing, which includes advertorials, to promote the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九). This is the main reason that veteran China Times reporter Huang Je-bing (黃哲斌) resigned in protest on Dec. 12, comparing the practice with propaganda by the Chinese Communist Party. Seasoned journalists and professors of communications have come out in droves against the practice, with more than 100 signing a petition calling on the government to stop the practice.
Some may ask what all the hubbub is about. Don’t all governments seek to promote themselves? That’s just a feature of party politics, right?
Embedded marketing involves advertisements that don’t stand out from other content in print or broadcast media. An ad for a leading corporation or political party can be made to look just like a news story, masquerading as the truth, even though a significant amount of money changed hands for it to be placed.
Just about every major news outlet in the world quietly employs teams of sharp, be-suited salespeople, working for independent companies, who spearhead the drive to get the CEOs of the world’s largest corporations and leaders of the world’s richest political parties to hand over oodles of cash for embedded marketing. This includes quality papers that print full-page stories — with an advertisement logo nowhere in sight or surreptitiously hidden away — about the benefits of doing business in a tiny -despot-led country where the rule of law can be bent at the will of a dictator.
The rampant use of embedded marketing in Taiwan has painfully obvious negative connotations for the role of news media here, and therefore the ability of that industry to prop up the country’s democracy.
So what is the government doing? Simple: blaming the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), apologizing and admitting how big the problem is, forcing a TV station off the air for broadcasting advertorials, but ultimately doing nothing to stop their use.
For senior officials of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration, when in doubt, blame the DPP. That’s exactly what Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) did on Tuesday when under fire for government use of product placements. Wu started by saying that advertorials were first used by the DPP 10 years ago, but failed to add that their use has skyrocketed since Ma came to power. Wu then apologized, admitting that the Ma administration has failed to address the issue properly, ostensibly showing the government’s sincerity — this was a political necessity given public anger. Then, right away, the government forced ERA TV’s variety channel off the air for violating rules related to embedded marketing, showing how serious the government is about stopping this practice. But why ban only one station when many are doing it? And why not push through regulations defining the use of embedded marketing rather than only relying on TV broadcasters to exercise self-discipline?
The answer is that embedded marketing is an effective tool in the political as well as corporate sphere. Neither the big corporate players nor politicians that are in power want this tool to be taken out of their hands. They had to look as if they were doing something, because it has come to public attention that this form of marketing is “dishonest,” as Wu put it. Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) went even further, saying he did not expect the legislature to pass regulations governing embedded marketing anytime soon.
So the government must obfuscate (blame the DPP), prostrate (say it’s sorry) and invalidate (crack down on somebody), but at the same time discombobulate (confuse by doing nothing).
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Keelung Mayor George Hsieh (謝國樑) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on Tuesday last week apologized over allegations that the former director of the city’s Civil Affairs Department had illegally accessed citizens’ data to assist the KMT in its campaign to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) councilors. Given the public discontent with opposition lawmakers’ disruptive behavior in the legislature, passage of unconstitutional legislation and slashing of the central government’s budget, civic groups have launched a massive campaign to recall KMT lawmakers. The KMT has tried to fight back by initiating campaigns to recall DPP lawmakers, but the petition documents they
A recent scandal involving a high-school student from a private school in Taichung has reignited long-standing frustrations with Taiwan’s increasingly complex and high-pressure university admissions system. The student, who had successfully gained admission to several prestigious medical schools, shared their learning portfolio on social media — only for Internet sleuths to quickly uncover a falsified claim of receiving a “Best Debater” award. The fallout was swift and unforgiving. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University and Taipei Medical University revoked the student’s admission on Wednesday. One day later, Chung Shan Medical University also announced it would cancel the student’s admission. China Medical
Construction of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County’s Hengchun Township (恆春) started in 1978. It began commercial operations in 1984. Since then, it has experienced several accidents, radiation pollution and fires. It was finally decommissioned on May 17 after the operating license of its No. 2 reactor expired. However, a proposed referendum to be held on Aug. 23 on restarting the reactor is potentially bringing back those risks. Four reasons are listed for holding the referendum: First, the difficulty of meeting greenhouse gas reduction targets and the inefficiency of new energy sources such as photovoltaic and wind power. Second,
RSS