Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) seems to have thrown the towel in the political boxing ring when it comes to opposing economic integration with China.
In the months before the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated government signed the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) with China, Tsai was a loud voice of opposition to the trade pact. She rightfully stated that the agreement — the same as the Closer Economic Partnership Agreement between China and Hong Kong in all but name — would likely lead to economic unification with China, but she has since fallen silent.
The ECFA has been signed, it is coming into force, economic integration is speeding up and Taiwan is likely to be engulfed by its behemoth neighbor one corporation, one firm, one consumer at a time. After its economy has been swallowed, the country will find itself unable to claim that it is anything but a renegade province of China, something Beijing has been claiming for the past 60 years.
However, just because that is the most likely scenario, should the opposition keep silent? Should Tsai give up because she has lost the battle? Should she stop being the voice for rights of workers, those workers who will lose their jobs because consumers will inevitably choose cheap Chinese products flooding the market over more expensive, locally made goods? Whatever happened to “when the going gets tough, the tough get going”?
As leader of the largest opposition party, Tsai told her supporters on Wednesday to refrain from protesting during next week’s visit by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林). According to DPP spokesperson Cheng Wen-tsang (鄭文燦), Tsai told party officials that Chen’s visits had become “routine business” and therefore there was no need to stage street protests while he meets with Straits Exchange Foundation officials.
It seems that Tsai is saying that because selling out Taiwan is now routine, there is no need to oppose it anymore.
This is not the first instance that Tsai has shown a weak spine when it comes to the KMT’s breakneck plan to unify with China. In the run-up to the special municipality elections last month, in which she was the DPP’s Sinbei mayoral candidate, Tsai refrained from discussing the ECFA, instead hinting that she would not necessarily push the party to repeal it if the DPP were to win the presidency in 2012. That was shortly after the April 25 debate with President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) in which she painted the ECFA as a flimsy cover for unification with China.
Just before her change of course, Tsai had rightly argued that the ECFA would cost jobs and reduce salaries, increase capital outflows, lead to a brain drain to China and cause an influx of white-collar workers from China.
Those arguments are all still true, but who is championing them? The only opposition figure who seems willing to step into the ring to stop Taiwan’s plummet down China’s throat is former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), but he is almost 90 years old. Lee already did his part to guarantee Taiwan’s future as a sovereign nation. Why can’t those who follow in his footsteps live up to what he created? Is it that the DPP is so ashamed by the fall of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) that it is now unwilling to live up to its own ideals?
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China