The record foreclosure auction of an apartment unit at The Palace luxury complex in Taipei for NT$282 million (US$9.14 million), or about NT$2.06 million per ping (3.3m2), on Tuesday has prompted a public outcry.
Most people felt great frustration and were concerned that absurdly high prices would continue pushing residential housing prices in the greater Taipei area higher; critics said the sale showed the government’s recent efforts to contain property prices had proven useless.
Amid growing calls from the public for government action to deter rampant property speculation, the Ministry of Finance said on Friday it was mulling transaction taxes on homes and land sold within a year of purchase by either amending current tax regulations or drafting new laws.
The ministry’s tax proposal, though not yet finalized, represents another step by the government in its efforts to stabilize the housing market amid concerns that overly high prices could provoke civic instability. It also came after recent market reports suggesting no sign of easing in real-estate sales and housing prices.
At first glance, imposing a capital gains tax on the sale of real estate within a year of purchase would seem to help discourage speculative investment. However, it could be just a case of wishful thinking if the tax authorities have no clue as to what the transaction prices really are.
In Taiwan, home and land transaction prices are usually not publicly disclosed. Unlike Singapore and Hong Kong, Taiwan has no transparency regarding real-estate information, which is known only between buyers and sellers, and therefore provides no benchmark for the calculation of a fair tax, let alone the problem of tax cheats.
The ministry said it was studying establishing a fair value to serve as the base for the potential capital gains tax if its taxmen cannot determine the real transaction price. In the worst-case scenario, the ministry might have to use the “current assessed housing value” (房屋評定現值) to calculate the transaction price and the capital gains tax, but the problem is that a home’s current assessed value is far below its market value.
The same problem applies to the “current assessed land value” (公告現值), which the government currently uses as the tax base for the land value increment tax (土地增值稅), which applies to any transfer in land ownership. According to the ministry’s data, a plot of land’s assessed value is about 80 percent of its market value in Taipei City, while the discrepancy between assessed value and actual market value is much wider elsewhere in Taiwan. The government also uses the land’s current assessed value, which is adjusted once a year, to calculate the compensation for land expropriation. However, there would be no land value increment tax if land changes hands many times within a year, because the current assessed land value would remain the same.
A positive development is that the Cabinet is likely to approve amendments to the Equalization of Land Rights Act (平均地權條例) soon, which will allow it to reassess land value more often to reflect market changes. Under the revised law, the government can adjust the “current assessed land value” many times a year in case of short-term irregular fluctuations in land values. It can also reassess the “publicly announced land value” (公告地價) every year instead of every three years to flexibly adjust the land value tax (地價稅), while raising the tax burden for land and housing speculators.
However, the amendments must still go through a legislative review, and since lawmakers have not put the amendments on their priority list for the current session, no one can be sure about their implementation. What people don’t want to see, however, are government pledges to ensure fair taxation ending up as nothing but empty promises once again.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS