Myanmar’s democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi has finally been released from house arrest after 15 years. Although the Nobel Peace Prize laureate has gained her freedom for now, her future and that of Myanmar’s democratic movement remain shrouded in difficulties.
The junta released Aung San Suu Kyi partly because the term of her house arrest had ended, and also because the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development Party, having gained a dubious victory in the Nov. 7 national elections, hopes to use her release to give legitimacy to the government that it will form, and to alleviate pressure from abroad.
However, Aung San Suu Kyi rejected the poll on the grounds of blatant manipulation by the junta, and she has not ruled out challenging the result through the courts. Now that she is free, Myanmar’s opposition forces are sure to rally anew. Possible outcomes include anything from the ouster of the government to the return of Aung San Suu Kyi to detention. Her release, then, signals only the calm before the storm.
Myanmar’s despotic rulers are so lacking in ability to govern that they habitually use force to make the Burmese submit to their rule. Any resistance is ruthlessly crushed. Wherever dissidents raise their voices, they may be deprived of their personal freedom or even killed.
The junta has held Aung San Suu Kyi under house arrest for 15 of the last 21 years. It even took advantage of an American’s swim to her house to extend her detention by 18 months and thereby keep her out of the election. The junta wants to isolate Aung San Suu Kyi and prevent democratic forces from achieving the unity to enable them to effectively challenge the regime. In reality, however, the longer the junta kept Aung San Suu Kyi locked up, the more she was admired by Burmese and respected around the world. By imprisoning Aung San Suu Kyi, the junta locked itself out of the world community and isolated itself from its own people.
China is another example of an autocratic government that suppresses democrats and dissidents. This year’s Nobel Peace Prize is to be awarded to jailed democracy advocate Liu Xiaobo (劉曉波). Beijing will not allow Liu or his wife, Liu Xia (劉霞), to attend next month’s award ceremony, just as Aung San Suu Kyi was prevented from attending when she won the prize in 1991.
However, China’s obstruction will not lessen the honor in any way. On the contrary, Liu’s absence from the ceremony will confirm the correctness of the Nobel Peace Prize Committee’s decision to give him the prize and justify his sacrifices.
Originally Liu was just one of many Chinese pro-democracy dissidents. He was neither the most important nor the most influential. Ironically, it was his arrest and imprisonment for initiating the Charter 08 democracy manifesto that focused attention on him at home and abroad.
Before the decision to give Liu the peace prize was announced, the Chinese government put pressure on the Norwegian committee not to award the prize to him. Once the announcement was made, Beijing blocked all news about it in China, and has pressurized EU leaders to skip the award ceremony. These moves will not silence calls for freedom and democracy in China. On the contrary, they will create a “Chinese Aung San Suu Kyi” and provide a new focus for China’s democracy movement.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry