Is it any surprise anymore that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-controlled government is holding secret meetings with top Chinese security officials?
Since former KMT chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) signed an agreement on cooperation between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 2005, nothing has been on the level. Backroom politics, secret agreements, obfuscation and cover-ups now define relations between these former enemies, now bedfellows. That’s why it comes as little surprise that Chinese Vice Minister of Public Security Chen Zhimin (陳智敏) visited Taiwan for a week last month to discuss who-knows-what with top Taiwanese officials, who remain anonymous because nobody in power wants anybody in the opposition to know just what’s going on.
The ramifications of secret meetings like this run deep. Former Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chairman Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) hit the nail on the head when he said that discussions between Chinese security chiefs and the Mainland Affairs Council, Ministry of Justice and Coast Guard Administration could be focused on combating “terrorism,” a euphemism that could easily be used to describe those who support independence, or those who disagree with President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) headlong push into unification. Once a secret agreement between the two sides’ security apparatuses is signed, it wouldn’t be hard to cooperate electronically to track and pressure pro--independence bloggers, activists and politicians.
If meetings like this become the norm, as Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Huang Wei-cher (黃偉哲) said he fears, then the public won’t know when their actions — which might have been legal in the past — will suddenly be considered dangerous or illegal.
Another suspicious coincidence is that Chen’s visit came at roughly the same time as the showdown between Japan and China on sovereignty over the Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台). The ongoing dispute directly involves the coast guards of all three nations that claim the islands — China, Japan and Taiwan. Setting the backdrop to these simmering nationalist tensions is unprecedented cooperation between the coast guards of Taiwan and China — an hours-long rescue drill off Kinmen Island, a place where the two sides used to do battle. In addition, the Taiwanese government allowed activists to board vessels leaving from Taiwanese territory to protest against Japan’s claim to the islands, escorting them with coast guard vessels. During this ugly confrontation, who steps across the Taiwan Strait to hold closed-door, secretive meetings with Taiwan’s coast guard? None other than one of the prime architects of the security crackdowns in Beijing, Hong Kong and Macau, China’s second-most powerful cop.
Why all this security cooperation? Isn’t the agreement on extradition of cross-strait criminals, stowaways and illegal immigrants — the Kinmen Agreement — that Taiwan signed with China 20 years ago enough? Why should the two sides meet secretly to strengthen cross-strait security, or hold so-called “peaceful exchanges”? The answer is because there will be a lot more people in Taiwan who disagree vocally with unification than there were in Hong Kong or Macau, and the groundwork needs to be laid. Once it becomes painfully obvious that the KMT and CCP intend to jointly unify the two sides of the Taiwan Strait, they’re going to have to act quickly to suppress all internal dissent and to unify their outward postures to discourage the involvement of Japan and the US. The talks surrounding these issues are not something they want to make public.
All this shows that things are a lot further along in the unification race than we had thought. Given the way the KMT and CCP are acting, unification seems like a done deal, with cross-strait markets and now mutual security apparatuses making the plunge before the politicians jump into the honeymoon suite.
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS