Myth of electric cars
Several models of electric car will enter the US market this fall. People tend to believe that electric cars are green or environmentally friendly, but this is not entirely true.
Electric cars do not necessarily reduce carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide or nitrogen oxide emissions in comparison to gasoline cars. These pollutant oxides are sometimes referred as COx, SOx and NOx, respectively. The COx may also include carbon monoxide and the SOx sulfur trioxide.
Most of the electricity used in the US is generated from coal. Three parts of coal energy can produce only one part of electric energy. Because of the high cost, carbon dioxide is not removed at all from flue gas in coal-fired power plants except in a few research, development and demonstration projects.
Carbon dioxide emissions from coal are the highest, followed by oil, natural gas, regenerable fuels and nuclear energy. Thus, an electric car using electricity generated from coal emits more carbon dioxide than a gasoline car does.
In coal-fired power plants, sulfur dioxide is generally removed from flue gas. In oil refineries, crude oil is also desulfurized when making gasoline. As a result, sulfur dioxide emissions are virtually zero for both electric and gasoline cars.
Nitrogen oxides are seldom removed from coal flue gas, again because of the increased cost, although processes like selective catalytic reduction, which uses ammonia to reduce nitrogen oxides into nitrogen, are commercially available.
An electric car does not emit nitrogen oxides when the car is driven, but coal-fired power plants generating electricity do cause nitrogen oxide emissions. A gasoline car has a catalytic converter to take care of both nitrogen oxide and carbon monoxide emissions.
It is well known that sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides cause acid rain and the latter is also responsible for smog, but the environmental impact of carbon dioxide on global warming is still controversial. Many people believe that Typhoons Morakot and Fanapi were caused by cyclical climate change rather than the increased concentration of carbon dioxide in the air. If this diagnosis is correct, a carbon tax is the wrong approach for climate change and will only serve to increase the cost of energy with little or no benefit in terms of controlling climate change.
The effects of carbon dioxide need to be clarified scientifically and independently of politics. If carbon dioxide is not an issue, electric cars can make use of the enormous US coal reserves and foreign oil imports can be reduced. At the same time, further research is still needed into fast battery charging, increased battery capacity and reduced vehicle costs.
CHARLES HONG
Columbus, Ohio
Legal madness
Many people in Taiwan make fun of, deplore and condemn the judicial process here. The judiciary has certainly had a number of disappointing “outcomes” recently.
Just today, I read about a 14 year old child who was adept enough to use a government run Web site, copy a report and then paste it onto a different site (which he registered in another country ... smart move) (“Teenager faces jail term for spreading false information,” Sept. 24, page 2).
The notice was spread through social media sites such as Plurk and led many people to read that Typhoon Fanapi would result in schools being closed for a whole year. A prank.
The story went on to say that a captain in the criminal investigation bureau said this teenager faced up to seven years in prison.
Sad, really, when you think that a child molester or rapist received a three-year sentence (and a few months to be correct) in another case that has disturbed quite a few people.
It boggles the mind how judges, prosecutors and others in Taiwan feel that they know how certain crimes should be punished.
If you ask me, 14-year-olds can’t really think about consequences ... they are too busy exploring, learning and having adventures. To throw this kid in jail and have a rapist out in half the time is madness!
HARRY ADAMOPOULOS
Taipei
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS