Chinese steel mills and mobile phone factories are being idled and thousands of homes in one area are doing without electricity as local governments order power cuts to meet energy-saving targets set by Beijing.
Rolling blackouts and enforced power cuts are affecting key industrial areas. The prosperous eastern city of Taizhou has turned off street lights and ordered hotels and shopping malls to cut power use. In Anping County, southwest of Beijing, an area known as China’s wire-manufacturing capital, thousands of factories and homes have endured day-long blackouts over the past two weeks.
“We can’t meet deadlines for some orders and will have to pay penalties,” said Han Hongmai (韓宏邁), general manager of Anping’s Jintai Metal Wire Co.
“At home, we can’t use the toilet” on blackout days because of a lack of power for water pumps, Han said.
While the US and Europe struggle with flagging economies, the power outages are symptomatic of China’s torrid growth and officials’ capricious use of their powers to meet the authoritarian government’s goals.
China’s economic expansion, which hit 10.3 percent in the last quarter, blew holes in government efforts to curb surging energy demand, pollution and emissions of climate-changing greenhouse gases. Beijing told local leaders to clamp down and stepped up pressure by sending inspectors to see the order was being carried out.
‘BLACKMAIL’
“You could say local governments are trying to blackmail the central government: If you order me to do something I can’t deliver, I will pass on the pressure to ordinary people,” said Yang Ailun (楊愛倫), a spokeswoman for Greenpeace China.
The Cabinet’s planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, scolded Anping officials for the household power cuts. The provincial government issued an order to see that all homes have power.
However, it’s not the first time something like this has happened.
In 2007, gasoline shortages disrupted the economy after refiners cut production in response to price controls. The next year, parts of China shivered through blackouts during a bitter cold winter after the government froze power prices, prompting utilities to cut expenses by letting coal stockpiles run low.
This year’s power cuts began after Beijing announced last month that an energy-efficiency campaign had suffered a setback as a stimulus-fueled building boom drove growth in steel, cement and other heavy industry.
Beijing’s plans call for cutting energy intensity, or energy used per unit of economic output, by 20 percent from 2006 levels by this year. The World Bank says China uses up to twice the energy per unit of output as the US, Japan and other economies. Chinese officials say energy use is 3.4 times the world average.
Energy intensity fell by 14.4 percent by the end of last year after thousands of antiquated steel mills and other factories were forced to close, the government says, but it crept back up by 0.9 percent in the first half of this year.
Beijing reacted by ordering 2,087 steel and cement mills and other factories with poor environmental controls to close. The Cabinet stepped up pressure on local leaders by sending inspectors to 18 of China’s 32 provinces and major regions to enforce efficiency.
“They understand that if they fail to meet this target it could potentially cast doubt, not just internationally, but domestically, about whether China is serious about tackling its emissions,” Yang said.
Yang said environmentalists welcome moves to close antiquated factories because that improves overall efficiency, but she said temporary blanket cuts come at a high social cost and the government should be taking more long-term steps, such as changing energy pricing to encourage conservation.
“What they are doing now is relying too much on harsh administrative orders,” she said.
In some ways, the power cuts are backfiring.
Han said his wire factory coped by purchasing its own generator, so it still uses power — but from a source that might be dirtier and less efficient.
Energy is politically sensitive for Beijing, which is trying to clean up the battered Chinese environment and rein in growing demand for imported oil and gas, which it sees as a strategic weakness.
Booming China passed the US last year as the world’s top energy consumer, according to the International Energy Agency — a report that Beijing angrily rejected.
EMISSIONS GROWTH
China is also the biggest source of climate-changing greenhouse gases. As a developing country, it is not bound by UN climate treaties, but has pledged to curb emissions growth, though it says the US and other advanced economies should do more.
Some of China’s biggest companies have been hobbled by the campaign, which is cutting production at a time when Beijing needs to create jobs to sustain a rebound from the global crisis.
Baosteel Group, a major steelmaker, announced on Sept. 1 it was shutting down a 2-million-tonne-a-year blast furnace in Ningbo, a port city south of Shanghai.
“The suspension could last over three months, causing a loss of 180,000 tonnes of steel a month,” the facility’s deputy director, Huang Ming, said in a company statement.
Zhejiang Province, where Ningbo is located, failed to achieve even a 1 percent improvement in energy intensity in the first half of this year, a provincial government notice said.
It said this year’s target is a 3.2 percent improvement.
In Jiangsu Province, north of Shanghai, factories that make mobile phones, computers and other electronics have been ordered to shut down for five days every two weeks, Chinese media reported.
In Hebei Province, authorities have imposed energy quotas on factories and threatened violators with fines and a cutoff of power and water supplies, state-run newspaper Shanghai Securities News said.
It said the curbs hit as steelmakers were preparing for a peak production season.
“People in the industry are heartbroken,” the newspaper said.
Additional reporting by Bonnie Cao and Ji Chen
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS