Chinese steel mills and mobile phone factories are being idled and thousands of homes in one area are doing without electricity as local governments order power cuts to meet energy-saving targets set by Beijing.
Rolling blackouts and enforced power cuts are affecting key industrial areas. The prosperous eastern city of Taizhou has turned off street lights and ordered hotels and shopping malls to cut power use. In Anping County, southwest of Beijing, an area known as China’s wire-manufacturing capital, thousands of factories and homes have endured day-long blackouts over the past two weeks.
“We can’t meet deadlines for some orders and will have to pay penalties,” said Han Hongmai (韓宏邁), general manager of Anping’s Jintai Metal Wire Co.
“At home, we can’t use the toilet” on blackout days because of a lack of power for water pumps, Han said.
While the US and Europe struggle with flagging economies, the power outages are symptomatic of China’s torrid growth and officials’ capricious use of their powers to meet the authoritarian government’s goals.
China’s economic expansion, which hit 10.3 percent in the last quarter, blew holes in government efforts to curb surging energy demand, pollution and emissions of climate-changing greenhouse gases. Beijing told local leaders to clamp down and stepped up pressure by sending inspectors to see the order was being carried out.
‘BLACKMAIL’
“You could say local governments are trying to blackmail the central government: If you order me to do something I can’t deliver, I will pass on the pressure to ordinary people,” said Yang Ailun (楊愛倫), a spokeswoman for Greenpeace China.
The Cabinet’s planning agency, the National Development and Reform Commission, scolded Anping officials for the household power cuts. The provincial government issued an order to see that all homes have power.
However, it’s not the first time something like this has happened.
In 2007, gasoline shortages disrupted the economy after refiners cut production in response to price controls. The next year, parts of China shivered through blackouts during a bitter cold winter after the government froze power prices, prompting utilities to cut expenses by letting coal stockpiles run low.
This year’s power cuts began after Beijing announced last month that an energy-efficiency campaign had suffered a setback as a stimulus-fueled building boom drove growth in steel, cement and other heavy industry.
Beijing’s plans call for cutting energy intensity, or energy used per unit of economic output, by 20 percent from 2006 levels by this year. The World Bank says China uses up to twice the energy per unit of output as the US, Japan and other economies. Chinese officials say energy use is 3.4 times the world average.
Energy intensity fell by 14.4 percent by the end of last year after thousands of antiquated steel mills and other factories were forced to close, the government says, but it crept back up by 0.9 percent in the first half of this year.
Beijing reacted by ordering 2,087 steel and cement mills and other factories with poor environmental controls to close. The Cabinet stepped up pressure on local leaders by sending inspectors to 18 of China’s 32 provinces and major regions to enforce efficiency.
“They understand that if they fail to meet this target it could potentially cast doubt, not just internationally, but domestically, about whether China is serious about tackling its emissions,” Yang said.
Yang said environmentalists welcome moves to close antiquated factories because that improves overall efficiency, but she said temporary blanket cuts come at a high social cost and the government should be taking more long-term steps, such as changing energy pricing to encourage conservation.
“What they are doing now is relying too much on harsh administrative orders,” she said.
In some ways, the power cuts are backfiring.
Han said his wire factory coped by purchasing its own generator, so it still uses power — but from a source that might be dirtier and less efficient.
Energy is politically sensitive for Beijing, which is trying to clean up the battered Chinese environment and rein in growing demand for imported oil and gas, which it sees as a strategic weakness.
Booming China passed the US last year as the world’s top energy consumer, according to the International Energy Agency — a report that Beijing angrily rejected.
EMISSIONS GROWTH
China is also the biggest source of climate-changing greenhouse gases. As a developing country, it is not bound by UN climate treaties, but has pledged to curb emissions growth, though it says the US and other advanced economies should do more.
Some of China’s biggest companies have been hobbled by the campaign, which is cutting production at a time when Beijing needs to create jobs to sustain a rebound from the global crisis.
Baosteel Group, a major steelmaker, announced on Sept. 1 it was shutting down a 2-million-tonne-a-year blast furnace in Ningbo, a port city south of Shanghai.
“The suspension could last over three months, causing a loss of 180,000 tonnes of steel a month,” the facility’s deputy director, Huang Ming, said in a company statement.
Zhejiang Province, where Ningbo is located, failed to achieve even a 1 percent improvement in energy intensity in the first half of this year, a provincial government notice said.
It said this year’s target is a 3.2 percent improvement.
In Jiangsu Province, north of Shanghai, factories that make mobile phones, computers and other electronics have been ordered to shut down for five days every two weeks, Chinese media reported.
In Hebei Province, authorities have imposed energy quotas on factories and threatened violators with fines and a cutoff of power and water supplies, state-run newspaper Shanghai Securities News said.
It said the curbs hit as steelmakers were preparing for a peak production season.
“People in the industry are heartbroken,” the newspaper said.
Additional reporting by Bonnie Cao and Ji Chen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then