Imagine that over the next 70 or 80 years, a giant port city — say, Tokyo — found itself engulfed by sea levels rising as much as 4.5m or more. Millions of inhabitants would be imperiled, along with trillions of US dollars worth of infrastructure.
This awful prospect is exactly the sort of thing global-warming evangelists like Al Gore have in mind when they warn that we must take “large-scale, preventive measures to protect human civilization as we know it.”
The rhetoric may sound extreme, but with so much hanging in the balance, surely it is justified. Without a vast, highly coordinated global effort, how could we possibly cope with sea-level rises on that order of magnitude?
Well, we already have. In fact, we are doing it right now. Since 1930, excessive groundwater withdrawal has caused Tokyo to subside by as much as 4.5m, with some of the lowest parts of the downtown area dropping almost one-third of a meter per year in some years. Similar subsidence has occurred over the past century in a wide range of cities, including Tianjin, Shanghai, Osaka, Bangkok and Jakarta. In each case, the city has managed to protect itself from such large sea-level rises and thrive.
hyperbole
The point is not that we can or should ignore global warming. The point is that we should be wary of hyperbolic predictions. More often than not, what sound like horrific changes in climate and geography actually turn out to be manageable — and in some cases even benign.
Consider, for example, the findings of climate scientists Robert Nicholls, Richard Tol and Athanasios Vafeidis. In research funded by the EU, they studied what the global economic impact would be if global warming were to result in a collapse of the entire West Antarctic ice sheet. An event of this magnitude would likely cause the oceans to rise by perhaps 6m over the next 100 years — precisely the sort of thing that environmental activists have in mind when they warn about potential end-of-the-world calamities. However, would it really be all that calamitous?
Nicholls, Tol and Vafeidis say no. Here are the facts. A 6m rise in sea levels (which, not incidentally, is about 10 times more than the UN climate panel’s worst-case expectations) would inundate about 41,400km2 of coastline, where more than 400 million people currently live. That is a lot of people, to be sure, but hardly all of mankind. In fact, it amounts to less than 6 percent of the world’s population — which is to say that 94 percent of the population would not be inundated — and most of those who do live in the flood areas would never even get their feet wet.
That is because the vast majority of those 400 million people reside within cities, where they could be protected relatively easily, as in Tokyo. As a result, only about 15 million people would have to be relocated, and that is over the course of a century. In all, Nicholls, Tol, and Vafeidis say the total cost of managing this “catastrophe” — if politicians do not dither and pursue smart, coordinated policies — would be about US$600 billion a year, or less than 1 percent of global GDP.
This figure may seem surprisingly low, but that is only because so many of us have accepted the widespread view that we lack the capacity to adapt to large rises in sea levels. Not only do we have this capacity, but we have demonstrated it many times in the past.
Like it or not, global warming is real, it is man-made and we need to do something about it, but we are not facing the end of the world.
Climate science is a subtle and fiendishly convoluted discipline that rarely yields unambiguous forecasts or straightforward prescriptions. After 20 years of much talk but precious little action on global warming, a certain amount of frustration is to be expected. There is an understandable desire to want to cut through the verbiage and shake people by the shoulders.
frustration
Unfortunately, trying to scare the socks off of people does not help matters. Yes, a startling statistic, combined with some hyperbolic prose, will make us sit up and pay attention. However, we quickly become desensitized, requiring ever more outrageous scenarios to move us. As the scare stories become more inflated, so too does the likelihood that they will be exposed for the exaggerations that they are — and the public will end up tuning the whole thing out.
This may explain recent polling data showing that public concern about global warming has declined precipitously in the last three years. In the US, for example, the Pew Institute reported that the number of Americans who regard global warming as a very serious problem had declined from 44 percent in April 2008 to only 35 percent in October last year. More recently, a BBC study found that only 26 percent of Britons believe that man-made “climate change is happening,” down from 41 percent in November last year. In Germany, Der Spiegel magazine reported survey results showing that only 42 perecent feared global warming, compared with 62 percent in 2006.
Fear may be a great motivator in the short term, but it is a terrible basis for making smart decisions about a complicated problem that demands our full intelligence for a long period.
Bjorn Lomborg is head of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and an adjunct professor at Copenhagen Business School. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Ursula K. le Guin in The Ones Who Walked Away from Omelas proposed a thought experiment of a utopian city whose existence depended on one child held captive in a dungeon. When taken to extremes, Le Guin suggests, utilitarian logic violates some of our deepest moral intuitions. Even the greatest social goods — peace, harmony and prosperity — are not worth the sacrifice of an innocent person. Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), since leaving office, has lived an odyssey that has brought him to lows like Le Guin’s dungeon. From late 2008 to 2015 he was imprisoned, much of this