Does a suddenly cooling housing market pose an immediate threat to highly leveraged construction companies or will a plunge in property prices sink domestic banks?
While the government continues to assure people the housing market is generally sound, despite the rising prices seen in some major cities, recent moves taken by the financial and monetary regulators have all the hallmarks of a pre-emptive attempt to cool the market, while also sending a clear message that they are serious about the issue.
Over the past few weeks, the Financial Supervisory Commission (FSC) has rejected fund-raising plans submitted by some listed construction companies, citing the firms’ high debt ratios and inadequate information to justify the plans.
While FSC reservations about these companies does not necessarily mean they will be unable to raise funds, whether to purchase more land or strengthen cash-flow, the fact that they are seeking to raise funds via a rights issue instead of requesting loans from banks invites inevitable speculation about their financial situation.
A key question is whether the banks have exercised adequate caution when providing loans to construction companies. If they have, the curbing of property speculation lies in the hands of lenders rather than the FSC.
However, it appears that banks’ loan activities have not been substantially impacted by the central bank’s recent credit-tightening measures. This is evident from the fact that the level of construction loans in Taiwan has risen since January and totaled NT$1.126 trillion (US$35.4 billion) in June, up 2.19 percent from a month earlier and 10.3 percent higher than a year ago, according to the latest data from the central bank.
Since March, the central bank, the FSC and the Ministry of Finance have unveiled various measures to curb rising housing prices. Last month, the central bank even asked domestic banks to take steps to prevent speculation on existing houses following complaints from the pubic.
Despite such concern, these measures have only caused a slight decline in the sale of existing houses in recent months and house prices in general have not dropped accordingly. Consumer housing purchases and renovation loans actually climbed 4.26 percent to NT$5.771 trillion in June from a year earlier, more or less the same as the previous month, according to the latest official data.
Little wonder then that the FSC is taking a greater interest in bank loans. The local media recently reported that the FSC has asked domestic banks to conduct stress tests to determine the credit risk posed by consumer and corporate lending. The reports said that the regulator has demanded that lenders gauge the impact of a worst-case scenario wherein property prices drop by between 20 percent and 25 percent, with the test results to be submitted by Sept. 15.
The stress test is intended to provide an early indicator for the risk management issues faced by banks given the continued rise in housing and construction loans in the first half of this year. What matters is not the absolute size of the loan provisions each bank may have to set aside, but their abilty to survive a plunge in property prices.
Assuming a price decline of up to 25 percent, instead of the 60 percent plunge assumed by the regulator in China, suggests that the FSC is not expecting property prices to fall that far in Taiwan. The message being sent is that the regulator will continue to introduce whatever measures it deems necessary to maintain healthy growth in the domestic property sector.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs