Recent violence in the legislature prompted well-deserved comments that legislators should act more appropriately. It also led to renewed protestations from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and its supporters that their conduct was a result of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) once again using its majority to force through legislation without obtaining consensus across party lines.
It should be emphasized, however, that KMT methods have been neither illegal nor undemocratic. In 2008, the people of Taiwan granted the KMT a clear mandate to govern, which is what it is doing. However, playing political hardball runs counter to democratic ideals if we forget that what makes Taiwan democratic is not abstract principles, but a body of rules and procedures, checks and balances, whereby power is shared and regulated.
While the current government may make mistakes or pass laws that some find objectionable, no one can accuse it of squandering a legislative opportunity to get things done, which was precisely the charge leveled at US President Barack Obama during his first year in office, after what many regarded as a naive attempt at bipartisanship.
This is not to defend the KMT’s legislative agenda or methods, which would no doubt benefit from less railroading as well as more openness and finesse. However, there will be other elections for the voters to judge the party’s performance and the KMT will contest those based on its agenda and ability to get things done.
Too often the DPP, whether it has been in or out of power, excuses its failures by blaming the unprincipled tactics of the KMT, China or both. The Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) has been a perfect storm for the kind of highly principled, but otherwise helpless outrage seen at the provisional session in the legislature on July 8, as the ruling party used its majority to alter the course of Taiwanese history.
Elections are coming and when they do, will voters opt for the party that sets an agenda and achieves it? Or will they vote for one that basks in playing the perennial victim, publicly acting out its impotence for the entire world to see?
The DPP must get its house in order, because its current approach just isn’t working. Not only does it have little to offer as an alternative to economic and cross-strait issues crucial to the country’s future, but party principles being what they are, the government has every reason to bypass legislative procedures that allow the opposition to obstruct progress at every step.
In addition to more pragmatism, the DPP should look internally for ways to trim the KMT majority. Nothing will undo recent DPP gains more than factionalism, especially in the south, where traditional party strength is being undermined by intra-party rivalries. What the DPP considered a constitutional crisis worthy of violence on July 8 was nothing more than the KMT voting along party lines — a characteristic of party politics the world over, which itself reflects the unity that DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) should have at the top of her agenda for party reform.
There is no future in excuses. The DPP lost the vote, plain and simple. Rather than beating the drum of victimhood, it should suck it up and prepare to do better next time.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.