President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) may have been elected in a democratic process, but after his inauguration, he has done all he can to destroy democratic mechanisms, moving the country toward dictatorship and dragging relations with China back to the civil war era as if they were an internal domestic issue between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Chinese Communist Party. By ignoring the nation’s sovereignty and democracy, he has forfeited legitimacy to rule Taiwan.
With his hired hands in the Referendum Review Committee, Ma has deprived the public of their referendum rights, directly challenging their freedom of speech. By letting his party lead the government, he has destroyed the balance of power by centralizing power in a one-man dictatorship.
Take, for example, Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien (王建煊), on whom Ma relies heavily. Wang rarely supervises the government, his main responsibility, but loves to preach to others about Ma’s accomplishments. Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平), who Ma has accused of being corrupt, acts like a deaf gangster who does everything Ma tells him to, even when it comes to the legislative process: He recently announced that the legislature was in session although the podium was surrounded by KMT legislators, disregarding objections from Democratic Progressive Party legislators.
By destroying the mechanisms for monitoring the government, Ma can ignore public opinion, reality and the legal code.
Not everyone is in favor of this state of affairs. Some people still try to reveal facts, and some media outlets refuse to become his tool. In this case, Ma uses a carrot-and-stick approach, declaring war on uncooperative media outlets and saying he will no longer “be polite” as he “fights back.”
Academics have called the media the fourth estate. Their main function is to report facts and monitor the government rather than act as a government mouthpiece. For example, the print version of the KMT’s party newspaper had to be withdrawn from a market that values freedom of expression.
The government’s role is to make and implement policy. In light of these powers, it is charged with explaining and defending its policies under public monitoring. If a policy is distorted or criticized for being unrealistic, it should offer an honest explanation.
However, the Ma administration is unaware of diversity in civil society and is hostile to criticism. Instead of meeting criticism with truthful explanations, it attempts to cover the truth and “fight back” using street language.
When media outlets criticize the government, it should provide a counter-argument rather than abuse because it plays a different role than the media. However, Ma ignores the differences between democratic mechanisms and tries to implement a dictatorial atmosphere where no dissent is tolerated. He has disarmed the legislature and the Control Yuan and learned from Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) how to threaten the media to hush them. In doing so, he has buried the legitimacy of his rule.
James Wang is a media commentator.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Taiwan Retrocession Day is observed on Oct. 25 every year. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government removed it from the list of annual holidays immediately following the first successful transition of power in 2000, but the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-led opposition reinstated it this year. For ideological reasons, it has been something of a political football in the democratic era. This year, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) designated yesterday as “Commemoration Day of Taiwan’s Restoration,” turning the event into a conceptual staging post for its “restoration” to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The Mainland Affairs Council on Friday criticized
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS