Monopoly is the world’s most-played board game that both young and old can enjoy. Although it simulates how people seek to amass a fortune by dominating assets or properties to maximize gains, the game was originally designed to teach us how monopolies would end up bankrupting the many while giving extreme wealth to one or two individuals.
Lessons learned from the board game, although it is just for fun, can be very real and close to reality in the world of business.
Far from business reality, however, as Tuesday’s fifth round of cross-strait negotiations in Chongqing, China, to ink the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA), as well as the previous rounds of talks between Taiwan and China.
The developments surrounding the negotiations leading up to the signing have been so surreal that some have even said that the final signing venue and date could be bad omens. Rarely in the history of humankind have nation-to-nation negotiations on issues pertaining to economic and market access been wrapped up in such a festive mood, along with the one-way generosity from China to Taiwan being put on display.
If Beijing is so generous in its nature, why hasn’t it backed down in the face of mounting international pressure over its currency? The reason is that China understands that if it lets its guard down too soon, it will have a huge bill to pay.
In the case of the ECFA, China will always be the larger business winner than Taiwan, given that past decades have shown an exodus of capital to China and that Taiwan is too small a market to matter for Chinese capital.
So in a post-ECFA era, the worst fear for Taiwan may be that China can easily overtake Taiwan with Taiwanese money, although conventional wisdom says that China might ease its military threat against Taiwan if it has business interests here.
So let’s take heed of former deputy defense minister Lin Chong-pin’s (林中斌) comments on Tuesday, when he warned that China has U-turned in its strategy toward Taiwan from its hawkish and hostile stance at the turn of the century.
China understands “it is cheaper to buy up Taiwan than to overtake Taiwan by force,” he said.
Thus, our “former” rival has learned to be a wiser player by hiding its true colors and resorting to mind games.
In this game, the more China gives away economic benefits to Taiwan, the more it expects to win the heart of Taiwanese, Lin said.
However, further behind this scene is China flexing its muscles to pressure Washington into halting arms sales to Taiwan, he warned.
For now, it is hard to believe that Washington would naively buy into the current mirage of peaceful relations between Taiwan and China and suddenly cease arms sales to Taipei without taking its own priorities and interests into consideration.
However, the chance that Taiwan could go “militarily bankrupt” still cannot be ruled out, since the nation’s future is being tugged at by the hands of superpowers.
So what price will Taiwan be paying in return for the many business gifts China has agreed to give under the ECFA?
That is a question that, from now on, our government needs to ponder constantly. The government also needs to be prepared to react quickly to any unthinkable consequences that may further put the country in the hands of monopolists.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.