There are many reasons why the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) has moved its office — not only because of the threats it has received.
The media have produced some misleading reports on this. The vast majority of people are capable of calm discussion, even where opinions differ. Everyone has the right to free speech. When it involves physical threats, however, this is no longer a matter of freedom of speech. A small group of extremists should not deny others their right to public debate.
“I know where Lin Hsin-yi works. [I know] she supports ending the death penalty. She should watch out.”
It was late 2006 when we received this call. The alliance was doing everything it could to stop an impending execution. A staffer picked up the phone and heard a voice make that threat.
Many of our friends and colleagues were very worried and wanted to report the threat to the police.
Four years later, I find myself in a similar situation. In fact, a number of organizations that support ending the death penalty — such as the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and Amnesty International — and even defense lawyers working pro bono on death penalty cases, are being harassed, verbally abused and threatened. And again we must decide whether to go to the police — especially after someone left a threatening letter in our mailbox.
I got another threatening call just last week.
“If we get rid of the death penalty, then I want to start killing people, too — just kill anyone I feel like — and then eat free food in prison,” the voice blurted.
I didn’t reply, I just listened. He kept saying the same thing, over and over again. Finally he added: “That woman Lin Hsin-yi, I’ve seen her on TV. I’m going to rape her, then kill her.”
But then he seemed to suddenly realize that I might be Lin Hsin-yi.
“Is Lin Hsin-yi there?” he asked.
I was stunned into silence. After a moment I answered: “This is Lin Hsin-yi.”
It was his turn to be shocked into silence. Then he seemed to want to show that he wasn’t backing down. He started up again, babbling hysterically about killing people and living off free prison food. But he didn’t say anything else about raping and killing me.
I still wasn’t saying anything, just listening, and finally he was quiet.
Then, in a small voice, he said, “I’m sorry,” and hung up.
This man had called because he wanted us — people against the death penalty — to understand how victims feel. Yet when he realized that the person he was talking to was the person he wanted to scare, he was stunned and had trouble continuing.
As for me, the anger and fear that I felt listening to him dissolved when I heard that small voice say: “I’m sorry.”
Now I can fully understand why many penal systems today are moving toward restorative justice. Hatred will never put an end to crime. We can only try our hardest to heal wounds and make the perpetrators of crimes understand what they have done. This is the only way to help victims.
After all of this, I still support abolishing capital punishment, and I still do not ask that victims or their loved ones forgive offenders. I only want society and the government to do something more for victims than simply offering them executions, and to create an environment in which we understand each other — perpetrators and victims.
Four years after that first threatening call, this time at least there was an apology. I can safely say that the public debate on the death penalty has made progress, too.
Lin Hsin-yi is the director of the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty.
TRANSLATED BY CELIA LLOPIS-JEPSEN
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS