There are many reasons why the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty (TAEDP) has moved its office — not only because of the threats it has received.
The media have produced some misleading reports on this. The vast majority of people are capable of calm discussion, even where opinions differ. Everyone has the right to free speech. When it involves physical threats, however, this is no longer a matter of freedom of speech. A small group of extremists should not deny others their right to public debate.
“I know where Lin Hsin-yi works. [I know] she supports ending the death penalty. She should watch out.”
It was late 2006 when we received this call. The alliance was doing everything it could to stop an impending execution. A staffer picked up the phone and heard a voice make that threat.
Many of our friends and colleagues were very worried and wanted to report the threat to the police.
Four years later, I find myself in a similar situation. In fact, a number of organizations that support ending the death penalty — such as the Judicial Reform Foundation, the Taiwan Association for Human Rights and Amnesty International — and even defense lawyers working pro bono on death penalty cases, are being harassed, verbally abused and threatened. And again we must decide whether to go to the police — especially after someone left a threatening letter in our mailbox.
I got another threatening call just last week.
“If we get rid of the death penalty, then I want to start killing people, too — just kill anyone I feel like — and then eat free food in prison,” the voice blurted.
I didn’t reply, I just listened. He kept saying the same thing, over and over again. Finally he added: “That woman Lin Hsin-yi, I’ve seen her on TV. I’m going to rape her, then kill her.”
But then he seemed to suddenly realize that I might be Lin Hsin-yi.
“Is Lin Hsin-yi there?” he asked.
I was stunned into silence. After a moment I answered: “This is Lin Hsin-yi.”
It was his turn to be shocked into silence. Then he seemed to want to show that he wasn’t backing down. He started up again, babbling hysterically about killing people and living off free prison food. But he didn’t say anything else about raping and killing me.
I still wasn’t saying anything, just listening, and finally he was quiet.
Then, in a small voice, he said, “I’m sorry,” and hung up.
This man had called because he wanted us — people against the death penalty — to understand how victims feel. Yet when he realized that the person he was talking to was the person he wanted to scare, he was stunned and had trouble continuing.
As for me, the anger and fear that I felt listening to him dissolved when I heard that small voice say: “I’m sorry.”
Now I can fully understand why many penal systems today are moving toward restorative justice. Hatred will never put an end to crime. We can only try our hardest to heal wounds and make the perpetrators of crimes understand what they have done. This is the only way to help victims.
After all of this, I still support abolishing capital punishment, and I still do not ask that victims or their loved ones forgive offenders. I only want society and the government to do something more for victims than simply offering them executions, and to create an environment in which we understand each other — perpetrators and victims.
Four years after that first threatening call, this time at least there was an apology. I can safely say that the public debate on the death penalty has made progress, too.
Lin Hsin-yi is the director of the Taiwan Alliance to End the Death Penalty.
TRANSLATED BY CELIA LLOPIS-JEPSEN
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under