You would think that Taiwan had become the murder capital of the world overnight if you were to believe the press in this country.
Driven by President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義), Prosecutor-General Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) and Minister of Justice Tseng Yung-fu (曾勇夫), and encouraged by the Judicial Yuan, the campaign for the abolition of capital punishment has been condemned without trial, case summarily dismissed and the death sentence imposed. This is an utterly unacceptable state of affairs.
The current environment fostered by our government, press-generated hysteria and a sense of moral panic amongst the public as a whole is quite regrettable. As a result, Taiwan has become mired in a conservative mindset preoccupied with traditional Confucian values, prey to callousness and indifference to suffering. Taiwan risks turning into a nation of irrational, clamoring, barbaric people with no regard for human rights.
Over the last couple of months death penatly abolition advocates have been subjected to slander after slander which, at times, has amounted to little more than irrational demonization.
Most of this has come from uninformed, anti-intellectual quarters quite ignorant of the direction the rest of the civilized world is moving in. Do they believe EU countries such as the UK, Germany, Sweden and Denmark, along with all the other countries in the world that have abolished the death penalty, are simply pretending to care about human rights? Is there any veracity at all to their claims that these countires would rather protect criminals than deal with the feelings of victims families?
Must we really join the ranks of the other 18 countries — including China, North Korea, Iran, Iraq and Yemen — that vigorously practice capital punishment?
It is wrong for the state to take the lives of people, just as it is wrong for individuals to do so. To make such an assertion in no way implies that murderers are innocent or that victims families should not be helped.
Ma, Tseng and Huang have consistently said that they see the abolition of the death penalty as a goal and have even voiced their support for such a move. But can they be taken at their word?
They appear all too willing to use capital punishment for political gain and that makes me doubt whether their support is genuine or conditional on public opinion polls. Up until this point, I have heard only arguments for why the death penalty should be retained and precious little about why they personally think it should be abolished.
Tseng has even asserted that it took European countries hundreds of years to do away with the death penalty, failing to make clear precisely from which date we plan to start counting. Is he suggesting that we should wait a century or two before we do so?
It is sometimes hard to beleive that it has been more than 20 years since the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ended martial law and introduced democracy in Taiwan. Both Ma and Tseng have said they favor abolition — do you believe them? Because I don’t, not one bit. They talk, but do nothing about it.
The government maintains that it is executing criminals in accordance with the law of the land, refusing to aknowledge that they are actually following two laws, now defunct, that were promulgated during the martial law period. It’s almost as if democracy never happened.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a research fellow at Academia Sinica’s Institute of Sociology.
TRANSLATED BY PAUL COOPER
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval