The local economy’s worst nightmare will be realized if China blocks Taiwan from signing free-trade agreements (FTAs) with other countries even if an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) is inked later this month.
Worries that Taiwan might have to endure this nightmare are not groundless.
In an official overture, China’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Ma Zhaoxu (馬朝旭) told a routine press briefing on Monday in Beijing that China “strongly opposes any official ties in any format that Taiwan might develop [with other countries], although it is not against any unofficial trade ties between Taiwan and China’s diplomatic allies.”
He made the remarks in response to reporters’ questions about whether China would allow Taiwan to nurture FTAs with other countries after an ECFA is signed — a question on which Beijing authorities have long taken an ambiguous stance.
Most Chinese officials shrugged off the question by saying it is too early to say or that the priority is for both governments to accelerate negotiations on an ECFA.
Usually, those indecisive answers often suggest something slightly suspect or something that will come with a price.
But President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration is obviously in a hurry to ink the trade pact and therefore buries its head in the sand whenever this question is raised.
The president and many of his officials, including former chairman of the Council for Economic Planning and Development Tsai Hsun-hsiung (蔡勳雄), appear to prefer wishful thinking and believe that, as Tsai once said, other economies will “mull negotiating investment treaties or Bilateral Immunity Agreements [BIAs] with Taiwan” once China agrees to an ECFA, which is similar to an FTA, with Taiwan.
But the reality is that fears of a Chinese boycott have long been the primary reason behind the reluctance of Asian countries to negotiate BIAs with Taiwan.
Now that the Chinese foreign affairs body has revealed its true colors and made it clear that it would not allow other countries to sign FTAs with Taiwan, that hope is immediately dashed, even if Ma has vowed to personally push for other FTAs.
As many economists have warned, the local economy will suffer more than it benefits from an ECFA with China, especially if other countries continue to fear China’s wrath and refrain from fostering FTAs with Taiwan.
Polaris Research Institute president Liang Kuo-yuan (梁國源) once urged the Ma administration to postpone the inking of an ECFA until China pledges not to block Taiwan from signing FTAs with other countries.
Now is the time for action, not words.
The Ma administration needs to do something concrete instead of making empty promises to reassure the public that the local economy will not be the victim of a political trap that will lead to other economies viewing Taiwan as a part of China and thus refusing to consider FTAs with Taiwan.
This should be set as a precondition for signing an ECFA before it turns into a nightmare.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
US President Donald Trump recently repeated his claim that “Taiwan stole America’s chip industry,” reigniting public debate on the issue. As a former Taiwanese minister of economic affairs and an entrepreneur deeply involved in semiconductor supply chain development, I feel a responsibility to clarify this misunderstanding. From the perspective of global industrial evolution and the economic principle of comparative advantage, such a statement appears overly simplistic and risks obscuring the essence of the issue. The rise of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry was not built on “replacing America,” but rather emerged as a result of countries pursuing different development paths within the
RSS