The central bank decided on Thursday to keep its key interest rates unchanged for a fifth consecutive quarter and did not raise the reserve requirement ratio. Is this a sign that the bank is putting the brakes on its recent moves to rein in speculative investment in the property market? The bank’s press statement that day said no.
The central bank said it decided not to raise interest rates because current rate levels were “appropriate and conducive to sustainable economic growth.” But the bank did see the threat of soaring property prices, saying: “Heightened housing prices and over-concentration of mortgage loans in specific areas in Taiwan have gradually become a source of concern.”
The bank said it had responded with a series of “targeted prudential measures” since last October and pointed a finger at investors who are pouring money into specific areas for “non-residential purposes.”
Based on this statement as well as what central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) said on Thursday, the bank has refrained from using heavy-handed measures to intervene in the housing market.
The bank’s main objective is still to closely monitor the flow of speculative hot money, even though it did not specify what kind of restrictive measures it would take to combat the money flow. If anything, the bank makes clear that it believes draining excess liquidity in the banking system through its open market operations — such as the issuance of short-term and long-dated certificates of deposit — would likely achieve the same results as raising the reserve requirement ratio to help bring down the level of excess funds flowing to the property market.
Unfortunately, the housing market appeared undaunted by the central bank’s efforts to target rising housing prices in certain areas. On Friday, the Real Estate Marketing Agency Association said property developers planned to launch a record-high NT$290 billion (US$9.1 billion) in pre-sale housing projects in the Taipei, Taichung and Kaohsiung areas, beginning this weekend. Coincidently, construction firm Huaku Development sold one of its office buildings in Neihu Science Park to unspecified foreign investors on Friday for NT$3.56 billion, an amount that is by far the highest in the commercial property market this year.
Of course, there are again political concerns ahead of the year-end special municipality elections. On Wednesday, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) expressed his reservations about proposed amendments to the House Tax Act (房屋稅條例) at a Cabinet meeting.
Yesterday, Wu responded to reporters’ questions on this matter, saying that the law’s revision would need to take many considerations into account, and that he considered the housing tax a matter for local governments.
Based on the Ministry of Finance’s proposal, the amendments are aimed at changing the current flat housing tax rate for residential units from 1.2 percent to a range of between 1.2 percent and 1.8 percent, as it wants to achieve an equitable taxation system and curb property speculation.
However, experience suggests any government measure to curb property speculation would not have much impact on the real-estate market and the proposed tax rate changes, if approved by the legislature, would only affect about 3.4 percent, or 300,000 households in Taiwan. Wu’s reservations about the amendments, although not an outright rejection, show again the central bank remains alone in battling inflows of hot money and the looming threat of housing bubbles.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS