The central bank decided on Thursday to keep its key interest rates unchanged for a fifth consecutive quarter and did not raise the reserve requirement ratio. Is this a sign that the bank is putting the brakes on its recent moves to rein in speculative investment in the property market? The bank’s press statement that day said no.
The central bank said it decided not to raise interest rates because current rate levels were “appropriate and conducive to sustainable economic growth.” But the bank did see the threat of soaring property prices, saying: “Heightened housing prices and over-concentration of mortgage loans in specific areas in Taiwan have gradually become a source of concern.”
The bank said it had responded with a series of “targeted prudential measures” since last October and pointed a finger at investors who are pouring money into specific areas for “non-residential purposes.”
Based on this statement as well as what central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) said on Thursday, the bank has refrained from using heavy-handed measures to intervene in the housing market.
The bank’s main objective is still to closely monitor the flow of speculative hot money, even though it did not specify what kind of restrictive measures it would take to combat the money flow. If anything, the bank makes clear that it believes draining excess liquidity in the banking system through its open market operations — such as the issuance of short-term and long-dated certificates of deposit — would likely achieve the same results as raising the reserve requirement ratio to help bring down the level of excess funds flowing to the property market.
Unfortunately, the housing market appeared undaunted by the central bank’s efforts to target rising housing prices in certain areas. On Friday, the Real Estate Marketing Agency Association said property developers planned to launch a record-high NT$290 billion (US$9.1 billion) in pre-sale housing projects in the Taipei, Taichung and Kaohsiung areas, beginning this weekend. Coincidently, construction firm Huaku Development sold one of its office buildings in Neihu Science Park to unspecified foreign investors on Friday for NT$3.56 billion, an amount that is by far the highest in the commercial property market this year.
Of course, there are again political concerns ahead of the year-end special municipality elections. On Wednesday, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) expressed his reservations about proposed amendments to the House Tax Act (房屋稅條例) at a Cabinet meeting.
Yesterday, Wu responded to reporters’ questions on this matter, saying that the law’s revision would need to take many considerations into account, and that he considered the housing tax a matter for local governments.
Based on the Ministry of Finance’s proposal, the amendments are aimed at changing the current flat housing tax rate for residential units from 1.2 percent to a range of between 1.2 percent and 1.8 percent, as it wants to achieve an equitable taxation system and curb property speculation.
However, experience suggests any government measure to curb property speculation would not have much impact on the real-estate market and the proposed tax rate changes, if approved by the legislature, would only affect about 3.4 percent, or 300,000 households in Taiwan. Wu’s reservations about the amendments, although not an outright rejection, show again the central bank remains alone in battling inflows of hot money and the looming threat of housing bubbles.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under