It has been 60 years since the 228 Incident occurred on Feb 28, 1947. All Taiwanese should know the cause of the incident, perhaps one of the most important events in Taiwan’s history, so that history is not repeated.
Opinion on the cause of the incident is widely divided. President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) calls it a rebellion against misgovernment, and one academic calls it a result of cultural differences. Neither of these views explain why the military and police from the “motherland,” who were enthusiastically welcomed when they arrived, stole the assets of Taiwanese and Japanese with abandon and slaughtered people.
Nor do they explain why an isolated incident led to a nationwide massacre, White Terror, and the 38-year-long Martial Law Era, not to mention the shocking murder of three members of former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) family on Feb. 28, 1980, more than three decades later.
On Dec. 3, 1943, the leaders of the Republic of China (ROC), the US and Britain issued the Cairo Declaration, demanding Japan surrender unconditionally and return Chinese territories — the four provinces in northeastern China, Taiwan and Penghu — to the ROC. But the three leaders did not sign the declaration, which was thus invalid and merely a “news communique.”
Because of former president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) deception, this is unknown to most people, who think the allies returned Taiwan and Penghu to the ROC. Chiang must have known that the ROC did not have legal ownership over Taiwan and Penghu.
On Sep. 8, 1951, the San Francisco Peace Treaty was signed by 49 countries, including Japan. The treaty officially came into effect on April 28, 1952. Until then, both Taiwan and Penghu were Japanese territories, something Chiang and the executive administrator of Taiwan, Chen Yi (陳儀), must have known.
This is also why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) troops that arrived here treated Taiwan as the territory of the Japanese enemy and the Taiwanese who welcomed them as surrendering Japanese citizens, and that is why they so unscrupulously stole the assets of Taiwanese and Japanese, and why the anti-tobacco smuggling campaign resulted in slaughter. That is also why the slaughter continued on a nationwide scale.
When the KMT’s troops were defeated in China in 1949, the KMT government had no choice but to relocate to Taiwan and Penghu despite the fact that these were not ROC territories. Since it had no place to go except for this illegally occupied land, it adopted repressive rule to achieve its goal of military occupation, resulting in martial law and the White Terror. A rebellion against misgovernment or cultural differences cannot explain these brutal actions.
If such claims can explain the long-term bloody crackdown, shouldn’t there be endless bloody conflicts since cultural differences exist everywhere in the world? The cultural differences between Taiwanese and Americans is greater than that between Taiwanese and Chinese people. So why do Taiwanese people get along peacefully with Americans?
The cause of the 228 Incident was occupation, pillage and oppression. Neither rebellion against misgovernment nor cultural differences were the real cause of the incident.
Kuo Cheng-deng is chairman of the Healthy Taiwan Society.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
RSS