Although President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has access to ample party and government resources allowing him to issue both threats and promises, he stumbled in Saturday’s legislative by-elections. This will have an impact on the year-end special municipality elections, and it also shows that Ma no longer has the ability to arouse enthusiasm among pan-blue supporters — voter turnout on Saturday was less than 40 percent — who no longer feel that supporting Ma gives them a sense of mission.
Some voters have said they “feel nothing.” This has created an atmosphere in which pan-blue supporters feel they must abandon Ma to save the pan-blue camp, and some are beginning to talk about supporting Taichung Mayor Jason Hu (胡志強).
When Ma won the presidential election on the back of 7.65 million votes, his campaign team proclaimed: “Ma does not rely on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the party relies on Ma.” They implied KMT officials and party workers were not worth much and were in great need of “reform and renewal.”
For example, when KMT Secretary-General King Pu-tsung (金浦聰) brought in Ryan Wu (吳睿穎) to “reform” the personnel administration, he just fumbled in the dark and even made a big affair of recalling many heads of county and city branches to party headquarters where they were punished for not working hard enough during the elections.
Outspoken KMT Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) said King thought “he had dug up treasure [in Wu], but he really only dug up a pile of shit.”
The problem is that after Ma and King teamed up and started playing up reform, their calls seemed to lack concrete content or direction. They have also failed to return the party’s stolen assets. Everything remained words on paper, which made the call for reform seem more like a slogan and an excuse for a purge.
In their attempts at manipulating local elections, party branches simply used Ma’s people. Some candidates were “parachuted” in while others were local candidates, and this was a cause of conflict that stirred up much ill feeling and instilled a sense of crisis in powerful local faction leaders because they were part of Ma and King’s “reform” target. Small wonder that there wasn’t much unity.
Ma’s inability to govern and his lackluster results have made life difficult for the public. Unemployment has gone up, civic order is deteriorating and the government is incapable of satisfying voters’ demands. The government’s pro-China policies lack vision, and this is frequently the reason the public calls for change.
The lack of direction has meant that there has been no structure to reforms. The reorganization of the Presidential Office, the Cabinet and the party has turned these institutions into a campaign team, only with some temporary make-up applied. The election organization is the only part that has been given some thorough thought, and there is a lack of comprehensive political considerations. Consideration is given only to the interests of big business and those whose business involves both sides of the Taiwan Strait.
This does not go unnoticed by voters, so when there is an election, they of course want to teach the government a lesson so that it understands what the public want, which is placing Taiwan first.
In short, the biggest defeat for Ma’s oligarchical rule is that the KMT no longer knows for whom or what it is fighting, while those who are afraid of becoming completely dominated by China no longer know where Taiwan’s future lies. It is not very strange that we are now hearing cries of “We love the emperor, but we love Rome more” from within the KMT.
Lu I-ming is a former publisher and president of the Taiwan Shin Sheng Daily News.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
RSS