Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was US President Barack Obama’s first official state visitor. India was an early stop in the travels of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was in India just last month to talk with his counterparts. Admiral Robert Willard went to meet with India’s political and military leaders in New Delhi only six weeks after taking charge of the Pacific Command based in Hawaii.
For Lieutenant General Benjamin Mixon, commander of the US Army Pacific, contacts with Indian Army leaders are a top priority; he traveled there last fall. At the same time, Lieutenant-Colonel James Isenhower, a battalion commander in the 25th Infantry Division in Schofield Barracks near Honolulu, led 300 soldiers with 17 Stryker combat vehicles airlifted to India for training. And Major Aljone Lopes, a specialist on South Asia, spends his waking hours at Honolulu’s Fort Shafter in staff support of the effort to foster military links with India. That the US has put on a full-court press to cultivate India is thus evident.
Gates told the press in New Delhi: “I continue to be impressed by our increased cooperation, cooperation that would have been unimaginable even a few years ago.”
He said India and the US “continue to look for areas to expand our engagement.”
The reasons, say diplomats and military officers experienced in South Asia, are clear:
• India is a rising democratic power that has shucked the constraints of the Cold War, notably its affiliation with the so-called non-aligned movement and reliance on the Soviet Union for military and economic aid.
• Even though Indian and US political leaders profess in public not to seek to contain China, India is seen as a counterweight to an emerging and sometimes belligerent China.
• India has become receptive to US overtures because good relations with the US could give New Delhi the wider access to the international stage that it craves.
• Nascent relations with the US give the expanding Indian economy access to US technology, business methods and investment.
• India has been looking for a new source of military equipment since Russia, with industrial problems after the breakup of the Soviet Union, has become unreliable. India imports about 70 percent of its military materiel.
• With Pakistan increasingly troubled and faltering in the struggle against terror, India has become a more likely strategic partner for the US. No longer does the US deal even-handedly with the two rivals.
• The Indian-American population in the US has grown, in large measure become economically comfortable or even wealthy, and has learned how to influence the nation’s politics, to include lobbying in Washington.
Military relations are essential to this embryonic partnership. The soldiers led by commander Isenhower spent a month in India, most of it in hard training. Once the initial individual and small unit instruction had been completed, the Indians and Americans swapped units. A US platoon was integrated into an Indian company and an Indian platoon joined a US company.
The Indian government asked the US Army to bring the Strykers, which are relatively new but have earned a good reputation in Iraq. The lightly armored vehicle comes in several versions, one being an infantry troop carrier and another armed, like some tanks, with a 105mm gun. Presumably, the Indians wanted to compare the Strykers with the Soviet infantry vehicle with which they have been equipped.
Since most Indian officers spoke English, communication with Americans was easy. With Indian sergeants and soldiers, the Americans relied on arm and hand signals, which worked reasonably well. Beyond that, the soldiers depended on their common experience.
As Major Lopes, the specialist on South Asia, said: “A soldier is a soldier is a soldier.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath