Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh was US President Barack Obama’s first official state visitor. India was an early stop in the travels of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was in India just last month to talk with his counterparts. Admiral Robert Willard went to meet with India’s political and military leaders in New Delhi only six weeks after taking charge of the Pacific Command based in Hawaii.
For Lieutenant General Benjamin Mixon, commander of the US Army Pacific, contacts with Indian Army leaders are a top priority; he traveled there last fall. At the same time, Lieutenant-Colonel James Isenhower, a battalion commander in the 25th Infantry Division in Schofield Barracks near Honolulu, led 300 soldiers with 17 Stryker combat vehicles airlifted to India for training. And Major Aljone Lopes, a specialist on South Asia, spends his waking hours at Honolulu’s Fort Shafter in staff support of the effort to foster military links with India. That the US has put on a full-court press to cultivate India is thus evident.
Gates told the press in New Delhi: “I continue to be impressed by our increased cooperation, cooperation that would have been unimaginable even a few years ago.”
He said India and the US “continue to look for areas to expand our engagement.”
The reasons, say diplomats and military officers experienced in South Asia, are clear:
• India is a rising democratic power that has shucked the constraints of the Cold War, notably its affiliation with the so-called non-aligned movement and reliance on the Soviet Union for military and economic aid.
• Even though Indian and US political leaders profess in public not to seek to contain China, India is seen as a counterweight to an emerging and sometimes belligerent China.
• India has become receptive to US overtures because good relations with the US could give New Delhi the wider access to the international stage that it craves.
• Nascent relations with the US give the expanding Indian economy access to US technology, business methods and investment.
• India has been looking for a new source of military equipment since Russia, with industrial problems after the breakup of the Soviet Union, has become unreliable. India imports about 70 percent of its military materiel.
• With Pakistan increasingly troubled and faltering in the struggle against terror, India has become a more likely strategic partner for the US. No longer does the US deal even-handedly with the two rivals.
• The Indian-American population in the US has grown, in large measure become economically comfortable or even wealthy, and has learned how to influence the nation’s politics, to include lobbying in Washington.
Military relations are essential to this embryonic partnership. The soldiers led by commander Isenhower spent a month in India, most of it in hard training. Once the initial individual and small unit instruction had been completed, the Indians and Americans swapped units. A US platoon was integrated into an Indian company and an Indian platoon joined a US company.
The Indian government asked the US Army to bring the Strykers, which are relatively new but have earned a good reputation in Iraq. The lightly armored vehicle comes in several versions, one being an infantry troop carrier and another armed, like some tanks, with a 105mm gun. Presumably, the Indians wanted to compare the Strykers with the Soviet infantry vehicle with which they have been equipped.
Since most Indian officers spoke English, communication with Americans was easy. With Indian sergeants and soldiers, the Americans relied on arm and hand signals, which worked reasonably well. Beyond that, the soldiers depended on their common experience.
As Major Lopes, the specialist on South Asia, said: “A soldier is a soldier is a soldier.”
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to