In a speech to mark the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) 115th anniversary on Nov. 21, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in his capacity as party chairman, said the party should be thankful to the people of Taiwan.
“We are extremely grateful to the people of Taiwan who let the KMT, which was out of power for eight years, return as the governing party,” Ma said. “We need to be humble and cherish this precious opportunity. We need to strive to hear the people’s voice and let the people be the real master of the country.”
Ma appeared genuine, his words sounded sincere and it was encouraging to learn that the KMT credited the public for allowing it back into the Presidential Office.
Words that are not followed by concrete action, however, are just words.
There has been nothing to show that Ma meant what he said, and it is becoming clear that his administration is not letting Taiwanese be the real masters of the country.
One group, which calls itself the People’s Sovereignty Movement, has called Ma’s bluff. Departing from Taipei on Nov. 8, the group began a 49-day protest walk around the country to promote amendments to the Referendum Act (公民投票法) and push for referendums on all cross-strait agreements.
In the past weeks, people from all walks of life — individuals in their 80s, mothers and their children, young people — have joined the movement. Despite the lack of media coverage of the event, the group has quietly promoted its ideals by walking, rain or shine.
Another group, this one counting 132,402 members, has voiced its support — with signatures — for a referendum on reopening talks with Washington on the import of US beef products.
There were signs of progress on this front on Tuesday, when Ma praised Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as a model of democracy in the Caribbean after it held a constitutional referendum on Nov. 25.
Maybe Ma has it within himself to recognize the significance of referendums in democratic societies (though it might be easier to praise the mechanism when it is used abroad rather than at home, where the outcome can obstruct government policy).
In his Nov. 21 speech, Ma waxed philosophical: “If a political party can take the initiative to push reforms, then I believe it could propel reform in Taiwan’s politics and let Taiwan be a quality democracy with substance.”
Rousing words indeed, but again entirely meaningless if they are not accompanied by concrete actions.
In the face of great challenges and rising public opposition to many of his administration’s policies, Ma’s slogans not only sound increasingly hollow, they risk degenerating into farce. If he doesn’t want to go down in history as a leader who talked big but accomplished nothing, Ma should tone down the rhetoric and start walking the walk. If he needs help taking his first steps, he should be reminded that he has 23 million masters in this country who would be more than happy to assist him.
Spare our ears and walk with us, Mr Ma.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS