President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) often stresses the importance of heeding popular opinion, cautioning his officials and agencies to show consideration in all they do to avoid leaving a negative impression with the public.
The state-owned Taiwan Tobacco & Liquor Corp (TTL) has become the latest agency to have a hard time understanding Ma’s words.
News that the company pledged 100 million yuan (US$14.6 million) to sponsor the Asian Games in Guangzhou in November next year outraged many people.
So much for creating a positive impression with the public. A state-run company that ignored the World Games in Kaohsiung and gave just NT$400,000 to the Deaflympics in Taipei is eager to hand over millions to support a sports event in China.
The company said the Asian Games deal was a cost-effective way to increase brand awareness of Taiwan Beer in the Chinese market. Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) was quick to approve the plan, saying “the tasty Taiwan Beer will sweep the mainland and the brand will promote Taiwan’s excellence.”
It is well and good to “promote Taiwan’s excellence” at every opportunity, but where was the corporate and government support when Taiwanese golfer Yani Tseng (曾雅妮) appealed to Ma earlier this year for funds to host a Ladies Professional Golf Association (LPGA) tournament in Taiwan?
Tseng boosted the standing of Taiwanese athletes in professional sports no end with her win in the McDonald’s LPGA Championship last year and another victory in the LPGA Corning Classic in May.
Many recall how Tseng appealed to Ma for the government to host an LPGA event. The LPGA had already expressed interest in the idea. While some critics were quick to claim Tseng just wanted to win money at home, she made it clear that she was willing to donate some of her winnings to make the tournament a reality.
Such a tournament would require US$2 million. Tseng’s hopes, however, were dashed by Ma, who after asking how much it would cost to sponsor a golf tourney here, said the amount would sponsor more than 10 marathons. The Sports Affairs Council also cited the “high cost” when rejecting the proposal.
Ma is better known as a runner than a golfer, so perhaps his uninterest is understandable. However, as a state-run company, TTL has a responsibility to support national sports development over sports in other countries. Its management stand condemned for promoting China while ignoring Taiwan’s struggle for greater visibility on the international stage.
If the government is interested in promoting excellence in all areas, there should be no difficulty in appropriating suitable funds — as TTL’s example shows. Given TTL’s generosity in spending taxpayers’ money to support sports in China, it appears that money is not the issue preventing Taiwan from hosting top-tier international tournaments.
The question is whether the government has the inclination and the backbone to promote Taiwan’s profile in the international sports arena — or any other stage — rather than give lip service.
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of