Money. The stuff that makes the world go round. Every day we earn it, spend it, exchange it and lose it. But you won’t find any Linden dollars, Eve ISK or Facebook credits down the back of the couch.
Virtual currencies like these are used for transactions in online worlds and social networking sites. While real-world currencies are on the slide, many virtual ones are going from strength to strength. In the second quarter of the year the equivalent of US$144 million was traded on the LindeX, the official currency exchange of Second Life, where residents buy and sell Linden dollars for their US counterpart — a 20 percent increase on the previous quarter, while the US economy shrank by 1 percent. Trading activity increased by 6 percent in the last quarter of last year.
“New ideas about money are beginning to evolve,” said Dave Birch, a director of Consult Hyperion, a management consultancy that specializes in electronic transactions. “You’d have a tough job convincing me that the pound [Sterling] is any more ‘real’ than World of Warcraft gold. Where is your starting point? The UK hasn’t had a gold standard for the past three generations,” Birch said.
It’s not the first time that virtual currencies have been mooted as the future of online payments. Several were launched in the late 1990s; but the likes of Beenz and Flooz were doomed to failure, suffering fraud and lack of consumer interest.
Lisa Rutherford, president of Twofish, which manages virtual economies for social, gaming and entertainment services, says the online landscape has changed.
“If you’ve going to do a large-scale universal currency, you need to have a certain level of scale, and it needs to be serving a certain purpose. That’s really what the fundamental shift has been,” she said.
Large-scale multiplayer online games have long featured complex virtual economies where players can purchase items and skills for their avatars. In Second Life, US dollars can be converted into Linden dollars and vice versa through channels in the virtual environment. Eve Online, however, operates a closed system: ISK brought by the player can only be used in the virtual environment, and conversion into real-world currency is prohibited.
Users caught breaching the rules are banned, but a black market has developed nonetheless; a Google search for “Eve ISK” lists hundreds of Web sites selling it along with other virtual currencies.
Eve Online’s economy is now more or less player driven, says Eyjolfur Guemundsson, an economist who works for Eve Online’s developer, CCP.
“It is simply monitored by us just like any other economy in the real world is by a central bank, finance minister or national economic institute,” she said.
Without careful oversight, cash can accumulate in the system, causing inflation. Linden Lab uses several controls to keep the exchange rate in Second Life relatively stable at about 265 to the US dollar. These include the pricing and promotion of various “sinks”, such as the cost of uploading content or posting classified ads, which remove currency from circulation. The volume of new Linden dollars available for purchase can also be adjusted.
Second Life’s European residents pay VAT (purchase tax) on some purchases in order to comply with EU tax regulations, and virtual economies could also be subject to further taxation in future.
“The controversy is whether taxable income is in fact created at the point when you obtain the virtual assets,” says Vili Lehdonvirta, a researcher at Helsinki Institute for Information Technology.
Despite careful oversight, even virtual worlds are not immune to financial chicanery. Allegations of a massive theft recently started a run on EBANK, which handled deposits in Eve Online’s ISK currency. One of the bank’s founders was accused of stealing about 250 billion ISK, exchanging it for £3,115.
Lehdonvirta expects to see further regulation of virtual banking.
“This is the direction it needs to go in the future if these virtual currencies are to be used as a serious platform for commerce,” he said.
While some entrepreneurs keep a significant balance in their virtual accounts, most people have a relatively small amount stored online.
“For example, while Second Life residents hold roughly US$25 million in Linden dollars, this is spread across millions of accounts,” said Tom Hale, chief product officer at Linden Lab.
By comparison, China has taken to virtual currencies in a big way. Last year nearly US$2 billion of virtual money changed hands in the country, according to the China Internet Network Information Center. Most virtual currency is spent on virtual items, but Chinese consumers also use it to purchase physical goods and services — a practice the Chinese government recently clamped down on.
Social networks have also launched their own currencies. Facebook credits can be used to buy virtual gifts — such as cupcakes, toys and flowers — from the Facebook Gift Shop. Select developers may soon be able to incorporate Facebook credits into their games and applications, with Facebook getting a cut of the profits. Business Week recently reported that Zynga, creators of the Mafia Wars Facebook game, could make US$100 million from its virtual offerings this year, mostly from Facebook sales.
Startups such as Jambool and Spare Change have launched virtual currencies that are interoperable across a range of games, applications and social networks, but Twofish’s Rutherford believes only a company of Facebook’s size can deliver the “brand promise” that would give a universal currency widespread appeal. Hale thinks that eventually there will be “a few dominant virtual currencies that by dint of their size become exchange currencies, just as the US dollar is to the global economy today”.
With faith in real-world currencies shaken by the financial crisis, perhaps virtual ones will find a more receptive mainstream audience in future.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS