In a speech on Wednesday to the nation’s civil servants, Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) said that maintaining sovereignty and ensuring the interests of Taiwanese remained the guiding principles of the government’s cross-strait policy.
“We should not do things that are not beneficial to the public. Those who execute cross-strait policies should act as gatekeepers when necessary and step on the brakes where necessary to maintain these principles,” the premier said.
Wu did not provide examples in the government’s current China policy that could be considered “putting the brakes on.” He would do well to look into a set of regulations recently promulgated by the Ministry of Education and — in his own words — “step on the brakes” to make sure Taiwanese interests are upheld.
A notice on Oct. 2 that the ministry issued to all local government education bureaus demanded they provide schooling assistance to Chinese spouses’ adopted children or children from previous marriages, as outlined in the Guidelines Governing the Education of the Children of Outstanding Overseas Science and Technology Talents (境外優秀科學技術人才子女來台就學辦法).
The notice immediately led to mixed interpretations. While Tainan City councilors across party lines interpreted the notice as an instruction to local education bureaus to give these children preferential treatment — such as enrolling them in public schools and giving them bonus points on college entrance exams — the ministry said the articles would not apply to this group, and that children from China would not be granted preferential benefits.
It is understandable that the ministry wishes to address the rights of China-born children and provide them with an amicable educational environment. However, a fair set of rules must be mapped out to ensure Taiwan-born children’s rights are not harmed as a result.
Details are yet to be clarified, but the fact that the notice was issued specifically in regard to Chinese spouses’ children from previous marriages is intriguing enough.
Why must the government single out children of Chinese spouses and allow them to use such guidelines? Such a decision could spur cases of forgery and fake adoption.
Local media recently reported that more than one in three Taiwanese colleges are likely to close in the next 12 years because of a shortage of students as the nation’s birth rate falls.
These regulations from the ministry will hardly encourage families to have more children if they believe that one day their children’s rights will be undermined.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is a master of making up rules to benefit strategic groups of people, as preferential treatment for military personnel and teachers attests to. The government under President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) leadership now appears to be planning to create yet another group of privileged people.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS