OctOBER 10 was the World Day Against the Death Penalty. So far, 90 countries around the world have formally abolished the death penalty, and more than 40 no longer carry out capital punishment in practice.
The EU and all its member states are firmly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty is considered incompatible with the principle of human rights, which is a fundamental pillar of the EU.
This year, the World Day Against the Death Penalty falls during the Swedish presidency of the EU. Sweden and the EU attach great importance to this issue and have long taken a strong position regarding worldwide abolition of the death penalty.
In many European countries, public opinion was not in favor of abolition at the time it was implemented. Today, however, it would be unthinkable to reintroduce the death penalty in any country of the EU, and there is no serious debate on that prospect in any member state.
The EU is opposed to capital punishment in all cases and under all circumstances.
HUMAN DIGNITY
First, we believe that the abolition of the death penalty is essential to protect human dignity and to the progressive development of human rights.
Second, the death penalty is irreversible. All available evidence shows that miscarriages of justice exist in all countries, no matter how many safeguards are in place to minimize the risk.
Third, there is no evidence to support the deterrent value of the death penalty. Most countries in Europe have had the death penalty at some time in their history. This being the case, we have extensive experience and have thoroughly studied the subject: There is no evidence to suggest that serious violent crimes increased after the abolishment of the death penalty.
Taiwan is much admired in Europe for its vibrant democracy and the vast improvements in human rights that have taken place since martial law was lifted in 1987. The example of Taiwan is often seen as a source of inspiration for others to follow.
Taiwan has seen two peaceful and orderly transfers of power as a result of democratic, free and peaceful elections. Taiwan has a free media, and open debate prevails. NGOs play an increasingly important role in society and protests can be peacefully organized for almost any cause. It is widely recognized that progress has been made in the legal process.
With regard to the death penalty, it is encouraging to note that no execution has been carried out in Taiwan since 2005. The penal code has been amended. Today, the death penalty is among the possible sentences for a limited number of crimes, unlike before.
UNRESOLVED
Nevertheless, the basic issue remains unresolved and the death penalty is still part of the legal system in Taiwan.
Furthermore, there are still numerous prisoners on death row and the death penalty continues to be meted out by the courts.
On the occasion of the World Day Against the Death Penalty, the EU appeals to all states that still have the death penalty to abolish it.
This appeal is also being made here in Taiwan, and in making it I have the support of all my colleagues from the EU here in Taipei.
We reiterate our call, made in previous years, for Taiwan to take the necessary steps to formally abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of those who are on death row.
Henrik Bystrom is head of the Swedish Trade Council in Taipei.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS