OctOBER 10 was the World Day Against the Death Penalty. So far, 90 countries around the world have formally abolished the death penalty, and more than 40 no longer carry out capital punishment in practice.
The EU and all its member states are firmly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty is considered incompatible with the principle of human rights, which is a fundamental pillar of the EU.
This year, the World Day Against the Death Penalty falls during the Swedish presidency of the EU. Sweden and the EU attach great importance to this issue and have long taken a strong position regarding worldwide abolition of the death penalty.
In many European countries, public opinion was not in favor of abolition at the time it was implemented. Today, however, it would be unthinkable to reintroduce the death penalty in any country of the EU, and there is no serious debate on that prospect in any member state.
The EU is opposed to capital punishment in all cases and under all circumstances.
HUMAN DIGNITY
First, we believe that the abolition of the death penalty is essential to protect human dignity and to the progressive development of human rights.
Second, the death penalty is irreversible. All available evidence shows that miscarriages of justice exist in all countries, no matter how many safeguards are in place to minimize the risk.
Third, there is no evidence to support the deterrent value of the death penalty. Most countries in Europe have had the death penalty at some time in their history. This being the case, we have extensive experience and have thoroughly studied the subject: There is no evidence to suggest that serious violent crimes increased after the abolishment of the death penalty.
Taiwan is much admired in Europe for its vibrant democracy and the vast improvements in human rights that have taken place since martial law was lifted in 1987. The example of Taiwan is often seen as a source of inspiration for others to follow.
Taiwan has seen two peaceful and orderly transfers of power as a result of democratic, free and peaceful elections. Taiwan has a free media, and open debate prevails. NGOs play an increasingly important role in society and protests can be peacefully organized for almost any cause. It is widely recognized that progress has been made in the legal process.
With regard to the death penalty, it is encouraging to note that no execution has been carried out in Taiwan since 2005. The penal code has been amended. Today, the death penalty is among the possible sentences for a limited number of crimes, unlike before.
UNRESOLVED
Nevertheless, the basic issue remains unresolved and the death penalty is still part of the legal system in Taiwan.
Furthermore, there are still numerous prisoners on death row and the death penalty continues to be meted out by the courts.
On the occasion of the World Day Against the Death Penalty, the EU appeals to all states that still have the death penalty to abolish it.
This appeal is also being made here in Taiwan, and in making it I have the support of all my colleagues from the EU here in Taipei.
We reiterate our call, made in previous years, for Taiwan to take the necessary steps to formally abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of those who are on death row.
Henrik Bystrom is head of the Swedish Trade Council in Taipei.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS