OctOBER 10 was the World Day Against the Death Penalty. So far, 90 countries around the world have formally abolished the death penalty, and more than 40 no longer carry out capital punishment in practice.
The EU and all its member states are firmly opposed to the death penalty. The death penalty is considered incompatible with the principle of human rights, which is a fundamental pillar of the EU.
This year, the World Day Against the Death Penalty falls during the Swedish presidency of the EU. Sweden and the EU attach great importance to this issue and have long taken a strong position regarding worldwide abolition of the death penalty.
In many European countries, public opinion was not in favor of abolition at the time it was implemented. Today, however, it would be unthinkable to reintroduce the death penalty in any country of the EU, and there is no serious debate on that prospect in any member state.
The EU is opposed to capital punishment in all cases and under all circumstances.
HUMAN DIGNITY
First, we believe that the abolition of the death penalty is essential to protect human dignity and to the progressive development of human rights.
Second, the death penalty is irreversible. All available evidence shows that miscarriages of justice exist in all countries, no matter how many safeguards are in place to minimize the risk.
Third, there is no evidence to support the deterrent value of the death penalty. Most countries in Europe have had the death penalty at some time in their history. This being the case, we have extensive experience and have thoroughly studied the subject: There is no evidence to suggest that serious violent crimes increased after the abolishment of the death penalty.
Taiwan is much admired in Europe for its vibrant democracy and the vast improvements in human rights that have taken place since martial law was lifted in 1987. The example of Taiwan is often seen as a source of inspiration for others to follow.
Taiwan has seen two peaceful and orderly transfers of power as a result of democratic, free and peaceful elections. Taiwan has a free media, and open debate prevails. NGOs play an increasingly important role in society and protests can be peacefully organized for almost any cause. It is widely recognized that progress has been made in the legal process.
With regard to the death penalty, it is encouraging to note that no execution has been carried out in Taiwan since 2005. The penal code has been amended. Today, the death penalty is among the possible sentences for a limited number of crimes, unlike before.
UNRESOLVED
Nevertheless, the basic issue remains unresolved and the death penalty is still part of the legal system in Taiwan.
Furthermore, there are still numerous prisoners on death row and the death penalty continues to be meted out by the courts.
On the occasion of the World Day Against the Death Penalty, the EU appeals to all states that still have the death penalty to abolish it.
This appeal is also being made here in Taiwan, and in making it I have the support of all my colleagues from the EU here in Taipei.
We reiterate our call, made in previous years, for Taiwan to take the necessary steps to formally abolish the death penalty and commute the sentences of those who are on death row.
Henrik Bystrom is head of the Swedish Trade Council in Taipei.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS