What might have come and gone with little fanfare has instead sparked a chain of events that has accentuated the fundamental differences between authoritarian China and democratic Taiwan.
When The 10 Conditions of Love, the documentary about Uighur rights activist Rebiya Kadeer, screens tomorrow in five cities around the country, it will enjoy attention the film could not have hoped for without the help of China’s relentless campaign against Kadeer.
Pressure — apparently applied through threats to cut Chinese tourism — that spooked Kaohsiung into reconsidering whether to include the film in next month’s Kaohsiung Film Festival, was an affront to Taiwanese values and destined to backfire. China, it seems — from its leaders to its ultranationalist hackers — learned nothing from a bungled attempt at censorship targeting the Melbourne International Film Festival last month.
But Kaohsiung’s reaction to the pressure — removing the film from the festival by rescheduling it — was equally offensive. The public outcry over its decision served as a sharp reminder to Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) that certain compromises will not be tolerated.
Chen’s administration has shown itself capable of engaging the Chinese to meet Kaohsiung’s needs, but it must remember that compromising free speech would never be in the city’s, or nation’s, best interest.
Tomorrow, on the 60th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China, the screenings will send a message to Beijing and the Chinese public alike: Censorship has no place in self-respecting countries.
After the shameful behavior of the central government, which has barred Kadeer from visiting Taiwan, that message remains equally meaningful at home.
Kaohsiung has backtracked on its decision, placing the film back in the festival after screening it prematurely last week. The city’s stand for free speech, while belated, is appreciated.
In contrast, the central government seems less likely to back down and let Kadeer visit in December. While both Premier Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and Executive Yuan Spokesman Su Jun-pin (蘇俊賓) said the government would not protest the screening of The 10 Conditions of Love out of respect for democratic freedoms, their concern for free speech apparently ends there. Kadeer will not be allowed to state in person the message she conveys in the film.
“We are a country that has independent sovereignty and freedom of speech,” Su said on Kaohsiung’s screening of the documentary.
The government’s actions belie its professed support for these principles. Its rejection of Kadeer was not the first indication that the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is willing to yield to Beijing on matters concerning Xinjiang.
A statement by the National Immigration Agency in July that Dolkun Isa, the secretary-general of the World Uyghur Congress, would not be allowed into Taiwan was disconcerting. As Isa had no plans at the time to visit, however, it was difficult to test the agency’s resolve on the matter. The refusal to allow Kadeer’s visit confirms that Isa would likely have been denied entry.
The question now is whether the government will be embarrassed by public criticism into showing some backbone. If not, the matter may not stop at barring dissidents from entry. Earlier this month, Isa was invited to a forum in South Korea organized by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, then promptly detained on arrival. It is hoped that activities such as this in Taiwan will not fall victim to pressure as well.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS