Last month Chinese hackers attacked the Web site of the Melbourne International Film Festival, retaliating against the organizers for screening a documentary about exiled Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer, a film that Australian director Jeff Daniels worked on for seven years.
After the Kaohsiung Film Festival announced that it would screen the documentary, The 10 Conditions of Love, China and Chinese forces in Taiwan issued a series of threats.
Media reports claim that Chinese tourists canceled thousands of room reservations in Kaohsiung because of the Dalai Lama’s trip there, and are threatening to do so again if the documentary is shown.
If this is true, then it is clear that tourism is becoming one of China’s political and economic tools for threatening Taiwanese and their government into accepting Chinese “values.” Beijing, it would appear, will use such bait to manipulate this country and take anything it can get, turning every profession and industry into a Chinese mouthpiece.
Taiwan is a free, democratic, independent and sovereign state. The protection of freedom of expression under the Constitution and other legislation means that the festival has the right to screen this film within Taiwan’s borders regardless of whether one supports Kadeer.
Without this freedom, we would be a vassal of China and lose our international status as independent and autonomous.
If the authorities heed Beijing on this matter, who is to say that the news China censors at home will not soon be deemed taboo by media outlets here?
Those who profess to love Taiwan should consider the reasons why. Among them, freedom and democracy must be safeguarded at all costs.
Taiwan tolerates calls for and against Xinjiang and Tibetan independence because this is a land of freedom and democracy — the universal principles of the 21st century.
Twenty or 30 years ago, junior high school textbooks used to call independence activists the “fifth column” of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but, as it turns out, they are China’s worst enemy.
In the past, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) political language manipulated values and confused minds. Today, should we continue to tolerate the fact that China hopes to distort Taiwanese values?
Those who would follow China along its current path should not forget that they enjoy its benefits because they hold the same opinions as China. China is also using them to attack the goal of Taiwanese independence; if one day there are no longer independence forces left in Taiwan, they will be discarded.
Kadeer was once the richest person in Xinjiang and a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, a post many dream of obtaining.
Why did she give up the benefits of wealth and being well-regarded by Beijing and sacrifice everything to promote the Uighurs’ right to freedom and autonomy?
The first condition of loving Taiwan is the ability to sacrifice fame and wealth to safeguard the nation’s core values of freedom and democracy — and so are the second to 10th conditions.
Tien Chiu-chin is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator-at-large.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS