Last month Chinese hackers attacked the Web site of the Melbourne International Film Festival, retaliating against the organizers for screening a documentary about exiled Uighur activist Rebiya Kadeer, a film that Australian director Jeff Daniels worked on for seven years.
After the Kaohsiung Film Festival announced that it would screen the documentary, The 10 Conditions of Love, China and Chinese forces in Taiwan issued a series of threats.
Media reports claim that Chinese tourists canceled thousands of room reservations in Kaohsiung because of the Dalai Lama’s trip there, and are threatening to do so again if the documentary is shown.
If this is true, then it is clear that tourism is becoming one of China’s political and economic tools for threatening Taiwanese and their government into accepting Chinese “values.” Beijing, it would appear, will use such bait to manipulate this country and take anything it can get, turning every profession and industry into a Chinese mouthpiece.
Taiwan is a free, democratic, independent and sovereign state. The protection of freedom of expression under the Constitution and other legislation means that the festival has the right to screen this film within Taiwan’s borders regardless of whether one supports Kadeer.
Without this freedom, we would be a vassal of China and lose our international status as independent and autonomous.
If the authorities heed Beijing on this matter, who is to say that the news China censors at home will not soon be deemed taboo by media outlets here?
Those who profess to love Taiwan should consider the reasons why. Among them, freedom and democracy must be safeguarded at all costs.
Taiwan tolerates calls for and against Xinjiang and Tibetan independence because this is a land of freedom and democracy — the universal principles of the 21st century.
Twenty or 30 years ago, junior high school textbooks used to call independence activists the “fifth column” of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), but, as it turns out, they are China’s worst enemy.
In the past, the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) political language manipulated values and confused minds. Today, should we continue to tolerate the fact that China hopes to distort Taiwanese values?
Those who would follow China along its current path should not forget that they enjoy its benefits because they hold the same opinions as China. China is also using them to attack the goal of Taiwanese independence; if one day there are no longer independence forces left in Taiwan, they will be discarded.
Kadeer was once the richest person in Xinjiang and a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, a post many dream of obtaining.
Why did she give up the benefits of wealth and being well-regarded by Beijing and sacrifice everything to promote the Uighurs’ right to freedom and autonomy?
The first condition of loving Taiwan is the ability to sacrifice fame and wealth to safeguard the nation’s core values of freedom and democracy — and so are the second to 10th conditions.
Tien Chiu-chin is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator-at-large.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS