After former premier Liu Chao-shiuan (劉兆玄) announced his Cabinet would resign last week, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) immediately appointed Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) secretary-general Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) to replace him and Taoyuan County commissioner Eric Chu (朱立倫) as vice premier. Liu’s decision to take political responsibility for the government’s poor relief work in the wake of Typhoon Morakot is praiseworthy. However, four issues pertaining to the appointment process of the new premier and his major tasks need to be discussed.
The first issue is the controversy over the violation of constitutional convention. Article 55 of the Constitution states that the premier shall be appointed by the president. Other Cabinet members should be appointed by the premier in accordance with the constitutional spirit of the Executive Yuan’s organizational design. Although former premiers always discussed the make-up of their Cabinet with the president, the right to name new members was still in their hands.
This time, however, the Presidential Office announced both the premier and vice premier, showing that the president appointed them both. Is this an attempt to restrain the premier? We don’t know. But whether it violated the spirit of the Constitution and political tradition must be thoroughly discussed. Otherwise, such an arbitrary act could be the start of the presidential destruction of the constitutional system.
The next issue is that several major budget plans were all proposed by Liu’s Cabinet, including the central government’s budget for the next fiscal year, the NT$120 billion (US$3.6 billion) for the Post-Typhoon Morakot Reconstruction Special Act (莫拉克颱風災後重建特別條例) and the budget for the expansion of domestic demand. These budget plans are both expensive and controversial. In particular, the money for the reconstruction act will be raised through public borrowing, which will add a heavy burden to the treasury. Government debt already stands at 33.82 percent of GNP, a figure close to the legal ceiling of 40 percent.
If the debt continues to grow like this, the nation’s sovereignty rating could be at risk. The budgets so rashly proposed by the former Cabinet should be returned to the new Cabinet for reconsideration so that limited resources can be distributed effectively.
The third issue is the question of whether the new Cabinet can carry out reform. The approval ratings for the previous Cabinet were quite low prior. Apart from the poor public image of several Cabinet members, this proves that many government policies need to be adjusted. The flooding and global financial crisis showed that the policies and performance of Liu’s Cabinet were dissatisfactory. The former caused great losses to human life and assets, while the latter caused the country to fall behind the rest of the region. Certain policies, such as the push for an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China, are rough and lack public support. As the year-end elections approach, the new Cabinet should not be a “campaign Cabinet.”
In light of the problems of the KMT’s rule in the past year, issues such as its pro-China stance, ignorance of public opinion, surging unemployment, the economic downturn, the widening income gap, post-typhoon reconstruction and even national land restoration, should all be reviewed and effective reform policies proposed.
Finally, Liu’s Cabinet resigned because of its poor relief work, which may have cost the lives of hundreds of people and caused huge economic losses. In the face of the A(H1N1) flu epidemic, we hope Wu’s Cabinet can learn from its predecessor’s errors. Every loophole must be closed so that no more lives are lost.
Taiwan Thinktank is an independent, nonprofit public policy research organization.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS