During a flag-presentation ceremony for the 21st Summer Deaflympics on Wednesday last week, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said that during his term as Taipei mayor, Olympic medalist Chi Cheng (紀政) called to ask if he was willing to launch a bid to host the Deaflympics. Ma said he agreed on the spot.
This remark betrays Ma’s tendency to lie and spuriously claim credit for himself.
Chinese Taipei Sports Association of the Deaf (CTSAD) secretary-general Chao Yu-ping (趙玉平) published an open letter on Oct. 17, 2007, when he resigned as chairman of the organizing committee for the Deaflympics. He could not bear to be associated with a soulless, failed Deaflympics, so he decided to leave the job to which he had devoted himself for six years.
The official Web site of the CTSAD also published a journal that Chao wrote in Frankfurt, Germany, entitled “Strive for peace through sports — the process of bidding for and organizing the 2009 Summer Deaflympics.” Below is a summary.
In March 2002, the CTSAD submitted a proposal to the Sports Affairs Council for bidding to host the Deaflympics, and it soon received approval. Later, the CTSAD was required by the International Committee of Sports for the Deaf (ICSD) to apply for proof from the council, the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and the Taipei City Government that they agreed to host the Games. While both the council and the committee provided the requested documents quickly, the city government refused to do so because it said the budget for the Deaflympics would be enough to hold the International Dragon Boat Festival 10 times over.
Before the application for the bid was due on June 30, Chao contacted Lee Ying-yuan (李應元) — the Democratic Progressive Party candidate in the then Taipei mayoral election campaign — through Chi Cheng. Lee offered his support for the bid. Upon learning this news, Ma’s city administration suddenly took an active interest in the matter — but the deadline had passed.
In November that year, John Lovett, president of the ICSD, visited Taiwan. The sports council covered all his expenses. During Lovett’s stay, Chao arranged a meeting between Lovett and then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), as well as the sports council chairman, the interior minister, the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee president and then-Taipei deputy mayor Pai Hsiou-hsiung (白秀雄).
In early 2003, the government sent a delegation led by Pai to attend an ICSD convention in Sweden. However, the Taipei City Government covered only the expenses of its own staffers; the sports council had to cover expenses for CTSAD personnel and promotional costs.
On the day of voting, Taipei City won the bid by garnering 52 ballots over Athens, which received 32 ballots.
It had been planned that after the delegation returned to Taiwan, the sports council, the Taipei City Government and the CTSAD would hold a joint press conference to announce the good news. Instead, the city government called an early press conference for itself and claimed all the credit.
After the organizing committee for the 2009 Deaflympics was set up, Chao was responsible for all preparations and arrangements. When he made an inspection tour of Melbourne in 2005, it was the sports council that covered all expenses. Taipei City only changed its attitude toward the Deaflympics and took the initiative to meet Chao to discuss matters after Kaohsiung City went all out in preparation for the 2009 World Games, receiving wide media coverage and public support in the process.
This is the real story of the 21st Summer Deaflympics in Taipei.
Hsu Chien-jung is a doctoral candidate at Monash University in Australia.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s