As predicted by public opinion polls, the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won a major victory in the Japanese general election on Sunday, forcing the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) to concede power.
The DPJ, which already held the biggest number of seats in the Diet’s upper house — the House of Councilors — has now won more than half the seats in the House of Representatives, so there will be no repeat of the situation in 1993 to 1994, when eight small parties formed a coalition government under former prime minister Morihiro Hosakawa. This is the first time that parties opposed to the LDP have held a majority of seats in both houses, marking a full transfer of power.
Many members of the DPJ were once in the LDP, including former DPJ president Ichiro Ozawa, who served in the key position of chief secretary of the LDP in the early 1990s. There are many others, however, who are former members of left-wing parties, so the public expects the DPJ’s policies to be significantly different from those of the LDP.
This is confirmed by the content of the DPJ’s election manifesto. Key differences lie in the two parties’ interpretation of the US-Japan alliance, their views of Japan’s role and duties in international affairs, the US military presence in Okinawa and so on. Observers are waiting to see how the incoming DPJ government will handle these issues. Next year marks the 50th anniversary of the US-Japan alliance. It is to be expected that the government will make a significant statement on the direction of the alliance, and its attitude will influence the overall Asia-Pacific security system. For this reason, everyone is paying attention to the DPJ’s views on Asia-Pacific security issues.
The 1995 review of the US-Japanese alliance coincided with the premiership of Tomiichi Murayama of the Socialist Party, but this did not result in a weakening of the alliance. On the contrary, it led to an affirmation of the alliance in the form of the 1996 US-Japan Joint Declaration on Security, and laid the basis for the 1998 revised Guidelines for US-Japan Defense Cooperation. Judging by this precedent, the DPJ’s accession to power does not necessarily mean that the alliance between the two countries will weaken. Still, Taiwan should give the matter careful attention. US military equipment and personnel from Okinawa helped Taiwan in the aftermath of Typhoon Morakot, highlighting the fact that the US-Japan alliance is not just a safeguard for security in the Taiwan Strait, but can also play an important role in dealing with natural disasters and other emergencies.
Four years ago, under the continuing whirlwind of support for then-prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, the LDP took nearly 300 seats in the House of Representatives, leaving the DPJ with so few seats that it could not even delay bills. Who would have thought that this year’s election would see the DPJ surging beyond 300 seats? Such is the effect of the winner-takes-all single-member constituency system, under which a party winning a plurality or small majority of votes can gain a great majority of seats.
The DPJ fought its way back from having just 112 seats four years ago to 308 now by stressing its policies of reform and rejuvenation. It used the multi-seat constituency electoral system for the House of Councilors to consolidate its power base there and then used the single-member constituency system to launch an all-out counterattack in the House of Representatives election. It is a strategy that opposition parties would do well to study. Rather than complain about the existing system, it is better to think about how to exploit the potential it offers. If Taiwan’s opposition Democratic Progressive Party can learn the lesson, it may be victorious once more.
Lai I-chung is an executive committee member of Taiwan Thinktank.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath