The 2009 World Games in Kaohsiung ended with hundreds of spectators waving the Republic of China (ROC) flag. The so-called “Olympic model” only requires that Taiwan participate in international sports events under the name “Chinese Taipei,” but it does not prohibit spectators from bringing ROC flags to sports events.
Ahead of the Games’ opening ceremony, the public was concerned whether national flags would be banned at the event. During the AFC Women’s Asian Cup in 2001, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who was then the mayor of Taipei, ignored a statement by the Sports Affairs Council that the “Olympic model” does not bar spectators from carrying national flags. Independence activists had launched an online appeal calling on spectators to bring national flags to challenge the impression that Ma upholds the flag. The city government responded by cracking down and prohibiting any display of the flag at the event. A series of similar incidents occurred in 2005, still under Ma’s mayoral term, when the ROC flag was banned at the International Auto Gymkhana, the Asian Judo Championships and the Asian Short Track Speed Skating championship.
Despite calling for the protection of the national title and flag, pan-blue politicians have long belittled the nation. In 1993, Lee Ching-hua (李慶華), the vice chairman of the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee at the time, traveled to China to resolve “political issues” that could have obstructed the visit to Taiwan of a men’s basketball team from Liaoning Province and a women’s basketball team from Hebei Province. The result was that Tang Ming-hsin (湯明新), former secretary-general of the Chinese Taipei Basketball Association, removed an ROC flag at a press conference to welcome the Chinese athletes. In addition, the national flag and a statue of Sun Yat-sen (孫逸仙) were covered during the games at the National College of Physical Education and Sports gymnasium in Taichung.
Past experience shows that Chinese sports teams and ROC flags never appear together at international games. If Taiwan insists on its rights, the Chinese teams pull out. Knowing that the ROC flag would be present at the World Games in Kaohsiung, the Chinese team skipped the opening and closing ceremonies.
The majority of pan-green supporters do not identify with the blood-stained ROC flag, yet, ironically, many of them feel excited when they see it overseas. Pan-green supporters also hold ROC citizenship, have to pay taxes and are eligible to run for public office. In addition, the pan-green camp was in power for eight years. Even if the Constitution is out of pace with the times, they should accept the fact that the Republic of China exists.
Although the pan-green camp is upset that the KMT brought the ROC and its flag to Taiwan, a look at history shows that many Taiwanese welcomed the ROC in 1945. It was only after the 228 Incident and the White Terror that Taiwanese came to realize the brutality of the KMT. The national title and flag are innocent as they are but tools with which the KMT oppressed the public.
While hardline pan-green supporters hope to establish a new, independent country with a new national title and flag, most people are not very keen to do so. Many people have also complained that the national title — the ROC — may be confusing to the international community. But since Taiwan is a democracy, the national title and flag must be changed through democratic means.
As a matter of fact, it is only the pan-green camp that is brave enough to display the national flag and say that Taiwan is an independent, sovereign state that is not subordinate to China. They do not succumb to Chinese pressure. When Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chu (陳菊) referred to Ma as “our president” during her visit to China to promote the World Games, she did better than any pan-blue government official. The KMT will never cross the bottom line set by China — that Taiwan belongs to China.
Many have been moved by the sight of Yang Hui-ju (楊蕙如) waving a national flag cheering for Taiwanese teams at sports events round the world. Because of this, she was refused entry to China when she was going to cheer for the Taiwanese baseball team at the Olympic Games last year. Last November, when Chinese envoy Chen Yun-lin (陳雲林) visited Taiwan, the government blasted pan-green supporters for carrying the national flag during protests. This highlights the difference between the pan-blue and the pan-green camps. Pan-green supporters now openly wave the national flag because it normally disappears when China makes an appearance. This will continue to be the case because the pan-blue camp dares not cross the line drawn by China for the sake of “cross-strait harmony.”
Hsu Chien-jung is a doctoral candidate at Monash University, Australia.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s