When the Control Yuan stood idle for just over three years from early 2005 following a pan-blue boycott of former president Chen Shui-bian’s (陳水扁) list of nominees, commentators regularly expressed concern about the lack of checks and balances in government.
The watchdog body finally got back to work last year following the election victory of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and the approval of his nominees by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-dominated legislature.
Since then, however, the body that is supposed to uphold the integrity of government hasn’t exactly covered itself in glory, producing numerous contentious and seemingly pointless verdicts.
On top of the contentious cases was the failure to censure a single law enforcement official over the excessive use of police force during the visit of Chinese envoy Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) last year and the initial failure last month to impeach former Government Information Office staffer Kuo Kuan-ying (郭冠英) after he admitted penning anti-Taiwan articles during office hours. An embarrassing U-turn on the Kuo case was performed only after a public outcry.
On the pointless side were motions like the one last month that censured the Ministry of National Defense over former army captain Justin Lin’s (林毅夫) defection to China — an incident that occurred more than 30 years ago.
Contrary to Control Yuan President Wang Chien-shien’s alleged comments in December that members should ignore unimportant petitions, or “little farts,” to concentrate on “big impeachment cases,” the Control Yuan seems obsessed with tackling inconsequential cases of graft among former government officials — people who, even if impeached, suffer no direct consequences.
While it is true that evidence of corruption often only comes to light after a particular official has left office, there is no point to such investigations if, as in the case of former vice minister of economic affairs (MOEA) Hou Ho-hsiung (侯和雄), no action can be taken.
The phrase “shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted” seems to be the most accurate description of the Control Yuan’s current purpose. It would be better advised to pass on any allegations of malfeasance to prosecutors.
To be of any value, the Control Yuan needs to monitor and tackle corruption within the current administration, but the lack of current investigations indicates either that the present government is as clean as Ma promised, or that there is a lack of mettle within the Control Yuan to investigate incumbent officials.
Members of the Control Yuan are supposed to be independent and beyond party control, but as the pan-blue boycott of Chen’s candidates and the legislature’s rejection of nominees deemed sympathetic to the pan-green side showed, the polarized politics in present-day Taiwan means government institutions cannot live up to constitutional standards.
The Control Yuan is responsible for censuring government officials at all levels, monitoring the government’s actions and protecting human rights, but if it is to be anything more than a paper tiger, then it should be truly independent. This is quite clearly not the case.
One solution could be to get rid of the Control Yuan altogether. After all, can anyone honestly say it was missed during its three-year hiatus?
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS