Global warming is fast rising in the pile of crises facing China as it pursues the unshakeable goal of economic growth while grappling with international pressure to curb its greenhouse gas output.
China, the world’s No. 3 economy, is the top greenhouse gas polluter, scientists say, and its emissions of the main greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, are set to keep rising.
The US’ climate change policy envoy, Todd Stern, is in Beijing this week, the latest in a succession of officials hoping to nurture agreement with China on containing emissions.
But any climate deal with Beijing is not going to be easy, and half a year remains until nations gather in Copenhagen to work out the treaty, which will succeed the current Kyoto Protocol, whose first phase ends in 2012.
A senior official in China’s National Coordination Committee for Climate Change, Gao Guangsheng (高光生), said bridging disputes on basic principles will probably push talks to the wire.
“I personally hope Copenhagen will reach an agreement with targets for developed countries and specific actions for developing countries,” said Gao in a recent interview. “But at present, to judge from the stances of various countries, it will be difficult to reach an agreement that satisfies everyone.”
The threat of global warming and pressure for a deal in Copenhagen are, nonetheless, driving Beijing to explore ways to reconcile development and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions.
Chinese think tanks have been seeking to map a path to a low-carbon economy and their ideas are likely to be part of what China might offer as a contribution to fighting global warming.
But these blueprints are still on the drawing board and would take years to be implemented, leaving decades before China’s emissions begin to level off.
Uncertainties about what Beijing will do to control its greenhouse gas volumes and what it will receive in return from rich countries, will make for fraught negotiations this year and beyond with Washington and other major powers.
“Reaching agreement at Copenhagen should be relatively easy, because nobody wants outright failure. But reaching an effective agreement will be more more difficult,” said Zhang Haibin (張海濱), an expert on environmental diplomacy at Peking University.
The emissions numbers are daunting, with China’s carbon output outpacing that of the US.
MOVING TO LOW-CARBON
Scientists say these mounting greenhouse gases from industry, transport and agriculture are dangerously overheating the atmosphere by retaining more solar radiation and poorer countries such as China could be especially vulnerable to more intense droughts, floods and storms.
But Beijing also says it must not be distracted from growing its economy and, like other developing countries, should not accept a ceiling on greenhouse gas output, which even optimistic Chinese experts expect to keep rising until around 2030.
By then, China’s annual emissions of carbon dioxide could reach 8 to 10 billion tonnes a year, unless stringent action is taken, said He Jiankun (何建坤), a professor at Tsinghua University in Beijing who advises the Chinese government on emissions policy.
In 2007, China’s carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels amounted to about 6.6 billion tonnes, according to US estimates.
China also wants rich nations to cut emissions by at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 — far deeper than the cuts now on offer — and to give up to 1 percent of their annual economic worth to help poor nations fight global warming.
“Ultimately, there will have to be compromise in Copenhagen, because these negotiations can’t be allowed to collapse,” He said. “If they do fall apart, that will be devastating, and nobody will be spared the repercussions.”
But China is also looking to take some of the initiative in climate change politics by setting its own the path to lower greenhouse gas emissions and eventual outright reductions.
The nation’s next five-year development plan, starting from 2011, will focus on creating a “low-carbon economy” by reducing coal use and encouraging clean energy, said Wang Yi (王毅), an expert on climate change at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
“In the past, China has been reactive in policy-making, responding when the West has put forward its demands,” said Wang, chief author of a recent 415-page study laying out a blueprint for a low-carbon economy. “Now instead of others criticizing us, we’re saying, ‘Why don’t we take the initiative by proposing our own policy goals?’”
These proposals build on China’s goals to cut the amount of energy expended for each unit of economic worth by 20 percent between 2006 and the end of next year, and to steeply lift use of wind, solar, nuclear and hydro power.
SETTING GOALS
One idea backed by some experts calls for carbon intensity targets, spelling out goals for cutting the amount of carbon dioxide emitted to create each unit of economic worth.
“We must incorporate addressing climate change and reducing the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions into national economic and social development plans,” said the summary of a meeting on energy and climate change issues chaired by Premier Wen Jiabao (溫家寶) last Friday, the central government Web site said.
China could offer to halve its carbon intensity by 2020 compared to 2005 levels, given the right funding and technology incentives from rich nations, Wang said.
But Beijing will remain reluctant to incorporate many of its domestic initiatives into an international treaty, especially any vows on emissions levels, experts said.
China stresses that global warming has been caused by the historically high emissions of wealthy nations and fears signing international commitments it may not be able to meet, Wang said.
Here, too, some experts said there was room for compromise if wealthy powers offer more in aid and emissions cuts.
“Ultimately what commitments the United States makes will have a big impact on what we offer,” Zhang said. “If it can be more ambitious and cooperative before Copenhagen, then so can we.”
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
RSS