Excitement about electric cars abounds nowadays, but consider the number of existing gasoline-powered cars — about 850 million. It would take years of new-car sales to make a dent in that number. That fact at first depressed Jiri Rasanen, a civil servant in Helsinki — but then it gave him and his friends a good idea. Why not keep the cars but replace their engines?
That idea would solve a lot of problems, starting not just with today’s installed base of cars, but with the installed base of car makers . Even though many of them are in trouble, it is probably not the best time to start a new car company, either. Yet while the market for new cars has slowed dramatically, it could be a good time to start a business replacing gasoline engines with electric ones.
The group’s initiative, led by Rasanen, is called eCars — Now! A small operation in Finland, it is less a company than a role model for companies that the team hopes will spring up worldwide.
Borrowing from the open-software movement, Räsänen and his colleagues want to make the idea and the basic designs free and encourage lots of companies all over the world to implement it locally. Some companies will make batteries or electric engines or retrofit kits; others will retrofit gasoline cars with the new engines — a great job opportunity for unemployed auto workers.
eCars- Now hopes to foster an ecosystem of car service workers and parts makers similar to the ecosystem of open-software programmers and generic computer hardware. Of course, the parallels end at some point, because batteries and engines aren’t quite the equivalent of PCs, but the ethos is much the same.
Rasanen and his team started by measuring the potential demand for electric cars in Finland.
“No one had done that before in Finland,” he said. “We decided that if we could get 500 people to show interest in a converted car, we could demonstrate that the mass conversion scheme would make sense.”
PROSPECTS
It took eCars — Now only 11 days to sign up 500 interested customers. To be sure, they merely indicated interest; they did not send money. But the company’s Web site continues to attract new prospects, with 1,000 people now registered as likely or certain to buy such a vehicle.
The site also solicited advice on which car to convert. The Toyota Corolla was the first choice — hardly surprising since it is the leading car model in Finland, with 7 percent of the market.
Just 15 months later, this month, a retrofitted Corolla demo model with an engine from Detroit-based Azure Dynamics was on display at the Electric Vehicle Symposium, a trade show in Stavanger, Norway.
What will it take to make this idea work? To some extent, it’s already working — by spreading. Local efforts may succeed or fail based on the talents of local implementers. In Italy, inventor Roberto Vezzi had a Smart-EV project along the same lines. He has now joined the eCars — Now movement, and his eSmart car will be upgraded with the open-source graphical user interface being developed for the eCorolla in Finland.
Other initiatives are springing up in Denmark, Latvia, Spain, and Turkey, says Rasanen. The group is now looking for an initial manufacturer/assembler for the retrofit kits (as opposed to the engines inside them). In the meantime, eCorolla and the eSmart will go through testing.
Overall, the economics make sense. Produced on an appropriate scale, a kit should cost about US$20,000, including distribution costs and a profit margin. It should take about eight hours for two workers in a professional garage to install such a kit, or less than a week for the car-owner himself/herself (or, as they say, two weeks if the car owner’s spouse “helps”). That’s considerably less than the cost of a new car — especially an electric one.
The real economic benefit, however, is in the cost savings thereafter. To be sure, a lot will depend on the availability of convenient charging stations, but they are starting to appear.
The project is deconstructing the car industry — probably in a more effective way than US government officials are doing in Detroit. In Finland, at least, all you need from the government is a certificate of inspection, which costs about 100 euros (US$135).
NEW JOBS
If all goes well, a host of electric car-engine and retrofit kit makers will appear, serving different markets of existing car owners. Dealers and mechanics will install the batteries, comprising a new corps of workers devoted (indirectly) to cleaning up the environment and adding value to the installed base of cars.
Any far-sighted government could help not by subsidizing these efforts, but by buying up the old gasoline engines. That provides an incentive to retrofitting companies, while competition for customers, rather than for subsidies, will encourage the various providers to be efficient. Many European governments currently have “cash-for-clunker” schemes that buy and destroy old cars; a cash-for-gas-engines scheme would make more sense by lowering costs and conserving the many car bodies that still work fine.
This project might have seemed quixotic a few years ago, but now it fits the times perfectly. It’s modest at a time when the world is in recession. It’s energy and environmentally friendly at a time when concerns about global warming are growing. And it’s distributed, at a time when the world is skeptical of leaders’ promises and people are realizing they have to do things for themselves.
If you want to start an electric engine company, learn how to retrofit a gasoline engine, or simply figure out what you could do with your own car, go to www.ecars-now.org to have a look. There may not yet be a ready-made solution for you unless you live in Finland, but that’s just the point: you can start a local version. If you build it, others will come.
Esther Dyson, chairman of EDventure Holdings, is an active investor in a variety of start-ups around the world. Her interests include information technology, health care and private aviation and space travel. COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS