In 2003, when Foundation Capital, a venture capital firm, started looking for new investors for Silver Spring Networks, one of its portfolio companies, it was rejected by every firm it called.
Investors in clean technology were just not excited about Silver Spring, because it makes hardware and software that utilities use to connect electric meters in a digital grid. They were more interested in companies that envisioned making energy from the sun’s rays, algae or tropical plants.
“People laughed at us,” said Adam Grosser, a partner at Foundation Capital.
Last summer, the thinking in Silicon Valley began to shift. Five top venture firms vied to invest in Silver Spring. The company chose Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, perhaps the most well-known green technology investor, and two of its partners, venture capitalist John Doerr and former US vice president Al Gore, joined Silver Spring’s advisory board.
Venture capital is starting to move away from its infatuation with alternative energy and returning to one of its traditional strengths: applying information technology to improve the efficiency of energy consumption.
Many investors say developing new forms of energy can consume hundreds of millions of dollars over many years before showing any return. Grosser’s firm, however, is looking for technologies that reduce demand for energy.
“We need to move markets with small amounts of money,” he said.
About half of the dollars invested in clean technology last year went to alternative energy companies. In the first quarter of this year, though, only one-third of venture dollars invested in clean tech went to these companies, the National Venture Capital Association said.
Foundation Capital, which hires former entrepreneurs, not bankers, as investing partners, early on set a firm rule for green technology: It would not invest in any startups that needed hundreds of millions of dollars in capital, government subsidies or high oil prices.
The partners started exploring clean technology in 2002 and estimate that they look at a thousand startups each year. They found nine and are now investing about a quarter of their US$750 million fund in clean tech companies.
Warren Weiss, one of Foundation Capital’s clean tech partners, heard about Silver Spring, which was started in Milwaukee. It equips electric meters with networking cards so utilities can see power failures before customers call. In addition, customers can see which of their appliances use the most electricity and at which times of day they need to conserve.
In 2003, he and Grosser visited a dingy, overcrowded warehouse and ate deep-fried Twinkies with whipped cream with the founders.
Foundation Capital invested US$8 million, moved the company to a technology office park in Redwood City, California, hired a new chief executive, Scott Lang, and began pitching investors.
After Silver Spring ran out of cash in 2005, Foundation Capital kept it alive for 15 months with monthly loan checks. In 2007, it found a new investor, Duquesne Capital Management. Around that time, Silver Spring landed its first big contract, with Florida Power and Light. Other utilities called, including Pacific Gas & Electric and Pepco Holdings, based in Washington.
Today, backed by Kleiner Perkins and Google’s venture fund, Silver Spring is heralded as a promising green tech startup with the potential to go public.
“I think they have recognized our strategy is viable,” Grosser said about Kleiner Perkins.
Foundation Capital also invested in SunRun, which sells solar power to homeowners. It does not make solar panels, though. Instead, it offers solar power for a monthly fee so homeowners do not have to pay the installation and maintenance costs of rooftop panels.
Foundation Capital’s most successful investment so far is EnerNOC. It monitors energy in office buildings, grocery stores and hospitals and alerts operators to move power to places that need it most from those that need it least.
On a hot summer day, for example, EnerNOC will automatically shut off one-third of an office building’s lights, turn the air-conditioning down 3˚C and stop the fountain in the lobby so the energy can be used elsewhere.
Paul Holland, another Foundation Capital partner, met EnerNOC’s co-founders in 2002 at Dartmouth, where he was talking to business students. EnerNOC’s idea — to regulate energy supply and demand — stuck with him.
Two years later, the founders called him, and Foundation Capital invested US$21 million.
EnerNOC went public in May 2007, five years after its first round of venture capital, and raised US$98 million in its public offering of stock. Its revenue was US$106 million last year, and that is expected to grow 55 percent this year, said Timothy Healy, its chief executive.
“There are a lot of people who went down that path of solar and fuels and wish they didn’t,” Grosser said. “From where we sit, we are very grateful we didn’t put a pile of money down.”
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US