Italy’s earthquake gives Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi a chance to show the drive that has kept him at the top of Italian politics for 15 years, while the economic impact won’t affect his popularity, which is still high despite the recession.
Before the disaster, opponents had called the conservative leader undemocratic for criticizing parliament as slow. That was forgotten on Monday as he visited the ruined Abruzzo region, still shaken by aftershocks, and rattled off orders.
“The government is here,” said the 72-year-old billionaire, repeating the motto he used in Naples to clear away in two months stinking piles of shoulder-high rubbish that the previous center-left administration had failed to shift in 20. In March he inaugurated a new plant, built in just 10 months, which will generate power from the trash.
On Monday in L’Aquila, the 13th-century mountain city turned to rubble by the earthquake that killed more than 200 people and made 17,000 people homeless, he vowed to repair the ruins and build a new town for young families “in 24 to 28 months.”
Italy is used to seeing pharaonic public works promised and never delivered, with funds siphoned off by officials and the mafia. In Sicily, people are still living in emergency huts built for victims of a quake in 1908 that killed 5,000 people.
WIDELY RESPECTED
But emergency response is now coordinated by the widely respected Civil Protection Department, which by early on Tuesday was well on the way to erecting 7,000 tents in and around Abruzzo’s main town L’Aquila, enough to house 40,000.
When questions were asked on Monday why the agency did not respond to recent warnings from an Italian scientist in Abruzzo that a major quake was on its way, seismologists and politicians of all colors dismissed it as “unscientific” speculation and defended the Civil Protection chief.
Side-by-side with rescue leaders in L’Aquila, a serious Berlusconi said now was the time to concentrate on relief and “later we can talk about whether earthquakes can be predicted.”
Berlusconi enjoys high popularity ratings in Italy — his own polls put him at more than 60 percent and independent polls at more 50 percent, way ahead of the center-left. These belie what he calls hostile treatment from the media, which he complains “makes one want to say ‘Go to hell!’”
Top Italian pollster Renato Mannheimer said Berlusconi had managed to circumvent the media and build a direct rapport with ordinary Italians, and his response to the earthquake was likely to further boost his ratings.
“Berlusconi is very popular. It is not that one event can change your popularity. But he has an ability to create a direct rapport with the population ... which works very well and has also worked in this case,” Mannheimer said.
“He is building a direct relationship with voters which he emphasizes in different episodes of political life. This is an ongoing process and is triumphing at the moment,” he said.
Rebuilding the medieval towns and villages of Abruzzo — which one journalist flying over the area said looked like “Lego broken into thousands of pieces” — seems a tough prospect for a country mired in its worst recession since World War II.
Berlusconi promised 30 million euros (US$40.6 million) in immediate aid and “hundreds” of millions more in EU disaster funds.
On past form, he will not be inhibited in his spending by Italy having the world’s third-highest public debt and a deficit that is expected to burst through the EU’s 3 percent ceiling this year, when economic output is expected to fall steeply.
But the earthquake’s impact on the economy will be limited anyway, said economist Paolo Mameli of Intesa Sanpaolo bank, adding: “This is more of a human story than an economic one.”
“It will have a negligible impact on growth and on public finance,” he said.
“Usually there is a negative effect on consumer confidence, but it’s very short-lived and in the longer term there can be a positive impact on growth from reconstruction,” Mameli said.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own