The government’s plan to sign an economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with China has provoked much controversy. This is just another move in Beijing’s plan to achieve unification through economic means. It intends to use ASEAN Plus One and other regional cooperation pacts to suppress and restrict Taiwan’s international economic space and lure Taiwan so far down the road of economic integration that it cannot escape.
Former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) “no haste, be patient” policy and the former Democratic Progressive Party government’s policy of “active opening and effective management” — later changed to “active management and effective opening” — were aimed at countering Beijing and preventing businesspeople from colluding with pro-China forces to push Taiwan down the road to Chinese domination.
With President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) aim of eventual unification, we are faced with collusion between government and business, both keen to rush into China’s embrace.
China makes no secret of its intention to annex Taiwan. Therefore, the government’s ideology-driven policy of looking to China for Taiwan’s economic prospects will have disastrous results for the country. There is no separation between political and economic concerns in Beijing’s treatment of Taiwan. All its policies are aimed at drawing Taiwan closer until it is entirely under Chinese domination. Some people in Taiwan, however, echo China’s claim that an ECFA should not be seen in a political light, maybe because they are naive or blinded by greed, or maybe because they harbor favor annexation.
The chief culprit obstructing Taiwan from establishing bilateral or multilateral free-trade agreements with other countries is China. The ECFA idea is Beijing’s barely disguised ploy to entice Taiwan into becoming part of China in terms of international trade. To see an ECFA as a way out of Taiwan’s so-called marginalization is, therefore, wishful thinking — unless, of course, its advocates are really intent on surrendering to the other side.
Taiwan has clearly lost more than it has gained on the road from former president Chiang Ching-kuo’s (蔣經國) 1980s “three noes” policy of no contact, no compromise and no negotiation with China to today’s growing dependence on China. Taiwan’s economic takeoff in the 1970s and 1980s was achieved by building close relations with the US, Europe and Japan.
Now that Taiwan is actively engaged in exchanges with China, it is putting more of its eggs in one basket, even though China is a backward country.
Production factor price equalization comes into play whenever an advanced economy integrates with a less-developed one. While individual business owners may profit from lower costs and a bigger scale of production, the process obstructs the upgrading of production technology and business standards. The economy of the more advanced country is weakened and workers either find themselves out of a job or see real wages decline.
Taiwan has recently seen the greatest ever fall in real wages. Clearly, Taiwan’s steps toward integration with China have done it great harm.
Disregarding these economic realities, the government remains determined to sign an ECFA. Worse, it wants to do so without going through the proper process of explaining the issues to the public, allowing open debate and forming a consensus. It wants to push the agreement through and have the legislature act as a mere rubber stamp.
If the public lets the government have its way, we will be headed toward becoming just another part of China, our lives at the whim of its despotic rulers.
Lu Shih-hsiang is an adviser to the Taipei Times.
TRANSLATED BY JULIAN CLEGG
China badly misread Japan. It sought to intimidate Tokyo into silence on Taiwan. Instead, it has achieved the opposite by hardening Japanese resolve. By trying to bludgeon a major power like Japan into accepting its “red lines” — above all on Taiwan — China laid bare the raw coercive logic of compellence now driving its foreign policy toward Asian states. From the Taiwan Strait and the East and South China Seas to the Himalayan frontier, Beijing has increasingly relied on economic warfare, diplomatic intimidation and military pressure to bend neighbors to its will. Confident in its growing power, China appeared to believe
After more than three weeks since the Honduran elections took place, its National Electoral Council finally certified the new president of Honduras. During the campaign, the two leading contenders, Nasry Asfura and Salvador Nasralla, who according to the council were separated by 27,026 votes in the final tally, promised to restore diplomatic ties with Taiwan if elected. Nasralla refused to accept the result and said that he would challenge all the irregularities in court. However, with formal recognition from the US and rapid acknowledgment from key regional governments, including Argentina and Panama, a reversal of the results appears institutionally and politically
In 2009, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) made a welcome move to offer in-house contracts to all outsourced employees. It was a step forward for labor relations and the enterprise facing long-standing issues around outsourcing. TSMC founder Morris Chang (張忠謀) once said: “Anything that goes against basic values and principles must be reformed regardless of the cost — on this, there can be no compromise.” The quote is a testament to a core belief of the company’s culture: Injustices must be faced head-on and set right. If TSMC can be clear on its convictions, then should the Ministry of Education
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) provided several reasons for military drills it conducted in five zones around Taiwan on Monday and yesterday. The first was as a warning to “Taiwanese independence forces” to cease and desist. This is a consistent line from the Chinese authorities. The second was that the drills were aimed at “deterrence” of outside military intervention. Monday’s announcement of the drills was the first time that Beijing has publicly used the second reason for conducting such drills. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership is clearly rattled by “external forces” apparently consolidating around an intention to intervene. The targets of
RSS