Early in his tour as commander of US forces in the Pacific and Asia, Admiral Dennis Blair was asked in a Congressional hearing what he sought to accomplish with military exchanges with China.
The admiral said he wanted the Chinese to understand two things:
First, they should be reassured: “We’re not sitting here planning to attack China. We’re not sitting here planning to contain China. We’re not sitting here dying to pick a fight with China.”
Second, he intended to warn the Chinese against miscalculation, the message being: “Don’t mess with us.”
Thus it is not hard to imagine the tall, lean, and plain-spoken retired admiral, who has been nominated by US president-elect Barack Obama to be the nation’s top intelligence officer, looking the president right in the eye during a crisis and delivering a candid report: “Mr President, here are the facts as best we know them.”
As Director of National Intelligence, Blair would be responsible for setting objectives and standards for 16 disparate agencies such as the Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency and National Security Agency, and for coordinating their sometimes conflicting operations.
Blair, who must be confirmed by the Senate, began his intelligence career as a young officer whose collateral duties included taking pictures of other nation’s ships in ports his destroyer visited or encountered at sea.
As a senior officer, he was an associate director of intelligence at the CIA, with a desk in the executive offices on the seventh floor at Langley, the agency’s headquarters across the Potomac from Washington.
Blair’s main link with intelligence, however, has been as a consumer. He absorbed intelligence on the staff of the National Security Council (NSC) in the White House, as director of the Joint Staff in the Pentagon and especially as commander of the Pacific Command.
From the headquarters in Honolulu, he ran the world’s largest command with 300,000 people operating from the west coast of the US to the east coast of Africa.
Blair’s experience includes extensive exposure to Asia, having travelled widely as Pacific commander, and some to Europe as a member of the NSC staff.
He majored in Russian studies as a Rhodes Scholar at Oxford University.
He has had less contact with issues in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America and will necessarily rely on others in those fields.
A recent essay Blair wrote for the National Bureau on Asian Research in Seattle provides clues to his thinking on military power in Asia.
“China, India and Japan will not match the power projection capability of the US,” he wrote.
Even so, they are “all developing the ability to deploy forces with the military capacity to threaten US power projection task groups.”
Blair asserted that “rather than initiating a scramble for power and influence in the region, the major nations in Asia seem more likely to use their power projection capabilities for symbolic purposes.”
He said, however, “a scramble for power and influence among major Asian powers would be likely if a drawdown of the US forward deployed military presence occurs in Asia.”
After he took charge of the Pacific Command’s headquarters in Honolulu in 1999, Blair showed that he was a demanding, if quiet, taskmaster.
Dissatisfied with the command’s war plans, he ordered them updated to account for China’s acquisition of modern Russian warplanes and ships.
“That was laborious stuff,” said one officer. “It took thousands of man-hours. Some of the staff had to work so hard they started calling it the ‘Blair Witch Project,’” the name of a popular horror movie.
Blair retired from the Navy in 2002.
In contrast, even though he is considered by some to be an intense, aloof workaholic, Blair has occasionally shown a playful streak. As captain of the destroyer Cochrane, with its home port in Japan, he tried to water ski behind the ship after she had been at sea for many weeks. Blair told friends he thought the crew needed a bit of entertainment.
Blair went over the side and was fed a rope by the crew of a gig, or small ship, then got into position aft of the ship to be pulled up on the water skis. When the destroyer started to speed, however, the sea was rough and Blair lost control. He went head over teakettle into the ocean, much to the glee of the sailors gathered on the fantail to see their skipper dunked.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs