With disturbing reports emerging in recent months of government meddling in the media and judiciary, it may be that our greatest protection against eroding freedoms and justice is public indignation. When checks and balances within the government fail to prevent unconstitutional interference, perhaps only embarrassment will convince the government to keep its hands to itself.
For this reason, the recent outcry over allegations of government meddling is cause for hope; a glance at the situation across the Taiwan Strait illustrates just this.
When Chinese newscaster Chen Yang (陳揚) made a joke about President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and social instability on TV earlier this month, he probably was not expecting to be sacked — which, according to media reports, is precisely what happened.
But in China, Chen’s removal from his show is nothing unusual: just one more ruined career to toss on the heap of media victims. Editors and journalists are frequently fired from their jobs and news columns or entire newspapers vanish overnight. There will likely be no complaints from fans of the Cantonese-language show, Another Look at the Daily News, aired in Guangzhou.
By contrast, in Taiwan, when a legislative committee passed a resolution last month to give the government item-by-item control over the budget of the Taiwan Broadcasting System (TBS), employees and the public loudly protested what they felt was an attempt to censor program content. A demonstration outside the legislature against the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT)-proposed resolution earlier this month reportedly drew thousands of participants.
With a KMT majority in the legislature, public pressure will be crucial to discourage encroachment on the editorial independence of TBS.
A key difference that has emerged between Taiwan and China since the democratization of the former is the Chinese public’s silence in the face of state interference — a luxury Taiwan’s government will hopefully never again enjoy.
Although China’s Constitution protects freedom of speech, authorities feel confident about flouting the rules with little or no pretense. The Chinese government stifles any discussion of its meddling in the media through a combination of fear and propaganda: Those who recognize the transgressions are too intimidated to talk, while others see nothing disturbing about hard-handed tactics when the “greater good” is taken into account.
This has long been a winning recipe from China’s point of view, and although the voice of dissent there has become distinctly bolder — and will hopefully one day unravel the country’s authoritarian regime — it is a system that remains firmly in place.
Decades after the death of Chinese leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and the end of the Cultural Revolution, citizens still function as informants dedicated to helping the government uncover and punish “subversive” thought. Two recent cases of university lecturers recorded by students and turned in to police for expressing dissenting opinions are clear examples of this twisted sense of civic duty.
Our real civic duty as we look ahead is quite the opposite — encouraging free thought and turning the lens of our skepticism on the government’s actions. Thankfully, the past few months have left no doubt that this skill is thriving in Taiwan.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS