PROFESSOR PRUDENCE CHOU (周祝瑛) recently published an article about the need to improve the skills of our university students in tough economic times (“The power of questions for students in limbo,” Jan. 1, page 8). In her article, Chou said university teachers are required to do research and are pressured to obtain doctorates.
This means, Chou said, that students who need remedial teaching and career counseling from universities are let through the system because their teachers do not have enough time for them.
The result, Chou said, is that many students are unable to identify their strengths and career goals during their four years at university.
Although the government promised to improve retirement packages for teachers at private universities some time ago, some professors at prestigious private universities have opted to teach at public universities, while even more professors from private universities are getting ready to do the same.
However, the majority of people are unaware that aside from those universities that are considered “low-quality universities,” a lot of universities that are heavily involved in Taiwan’s Teaching Excellence Programs (教學卓越計畫) are also plagued by the same problems.
Both private universities and our government have an equal responsibility in improving education in Taiwan. Shouldn’t a government that emphasizes education help private universities in achieving their goals of improving education? Aren’t the problems private universities are facing serious?
Private universities are facing serious problems — problems that cannot be solved overnight. In the past, teachers at private universities could spend the majority of their time teaching. Even with the discrepancies in salary and retirement packages between private and public universities, this fact was one factor that helped them attract teachers.
However, the uniform appraisal and promotion systems that have been implemented in recent years have had a heavy impact on these schools. The standards for the appraisal and promotion systems are supposed to be a combination of factors such as teaching, service and academia.
In reality, however, academic performance is the primary criteria of these systems. This means that teachers at private universities must devote more time on research and spend less on teaching and career counseling.
Such a situation makes many teachers ask themselves why they should stay at private universities with relatively lower salaries and retirement packages when they are performing almost the same duties as they would at public universities.
Because of a large drop in the birthrate and the limitations placed on the competitiveness of private universities by the uniform appraisal and promotion systems, teachers there worry that if they do not take the opportunity to leave private institutions now, they will be left with nothing in the event that their universities close down.
Therefore, over time, teachers at private universities began emphasizing academic performance in preparation for going to teach at public universities. This affects teaching at private universities because teachers are not as devoted to teaching as they were before.
There is a large gap between tuition fees at private universities in Taiwan and China. Secondly, China already has too many university students and those who do choose to come to Taiwan to study would choose universities that have better reputations, otherwise they would have no chance of finding jobs after returning to China.
Private universities with better finances have come up with ways to lower the gaps in salaries and retirement packages for teachers. Universities that have not been able to make adjustments to their systems are losing their teachers and face other pressures from problems related to salaries, retirement packages and a drop in the number of students. If these universities are unable to obtain financial assistance, they will have to either shut down or lay off employees, with tuition fees being controlled by the Ministry of Education. Employees with a competitive advantage will leave these universities before they lose their jobs, which will only exacerbate the problems.
The first way in which these problems can be resolved is to make our universities more liberal and diverse. The uniform appraisal and promotion systems have to be discontinued, universities must be allowed to find their own competitive advantages and not be forced to emphasize research only. Also, the government should allow foreign universities to invest in or acquire private universities.
The second way in which these problems can be resolved is to discontinue the fee control policies at private universities. Universities are no longer oligopolies and students have a wide range of choices in terms of where they seek higher education. Well-known universities such as Harvard charge extraordinarily high fees, however, because these universities have their own competitive advantages and students are not put off by their higher fees. Private universities in Taiwan should be allowed to develop their own competitive advantages.
If the government keeps ignoring this problem, we could very well witness a wave of private universities closing their doors in the next few years.
Ben Wu is an assistant professor in the Department of Information Management at Fujen Catholic University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
With its passing of Hong Kong’s new National Security Law, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to tighten its noose on Hong Kong. Gone is the broken 1997 promise that Hong Kong would have free, democratic elections by 2017. Gone also is any semblance that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) plays the long game. All the CCP had to do was hold the fort until 2047, when the “one country, two systems” framework would end and Hong Kong would rejoin the “motherland.” It would be a “demonstration-free” event. Instead, with the seemingly benevolent velvet glove off, the CCP has revealed its true iron
At the end of last month, Paraguayan Ambassador to Taiwan Marcial Bobadilla Guillen told a group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators that his president had decided to maintain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, despite pressure from the Chinese government and local businesses who would like to see a switch to Beijing. This followed the Paraguayan Senate earlier this year voting against a proposal to establish ties with China in exchange for medical supplies. This constituted a double rebuke of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) diplomatic agenda in a six-month span from Taiwan’s only diplomatic ally in South America. Last year, Tuvalu rejected an
South China Sea exercises in July by two United States Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers reminds that Taiwan’s history since mid-1950, and as a free nation, is intertwined with that of the aircraft carrier. Eventually Taiwan will host aircraft carriers, either those built under its democratic government or those imposed on its territory by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN). By September 1944, a lack of sufficient carrier airpower and land-based airpower persuaded US Army and Navy leaders to forgo an invasion to wrest Taiwan from Japanese control, thereby sparing Taiwanese considerable wartime destruction. But two
As Taiwan is engulfed in worries about Chinese infiltration, news reports have revealed that power inverters made by China’s Huawei Technologies Co are used in the solar panels on the top of the Legislative Yuan’s Zhenjiang House (鎮江會館) on Zhenjiang Street in Taipei. However, what is even more worrying is that Taiwan’s new national electronic identification card (eID) has been subcontracted to the French security firm and eID maker Idemia, which has not only cooperated with the Chinese Public Security Bureau to manufacture eIDs in China, but also makes the new identification cards being issued in Hong Kong. There might be more