On Dec. 10, 1948, the UN General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Sixty years later, Taiwan prides itself on its peaceful democratization. However, many human rights and media watchdogs, both local and international, have expressed concerns over an increase in human rights violations and restrictions on civil liberties since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office in May.
RESTRICTIONS ON CIVIL LIBERTIES
Freedom House has called for an independent investigation into the violent clashes between the police and protesters during the visit of Chinese cross-strait negotiator Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) early last month.
PHOTO: AFP
Amnesty International has asked that the Control Yuan address the serious concerns raised by civil society in Taiwan and that the Ma administration end the practice of using the Assembly and Parade Law (集會遊行法) to deny freedom of assembly.
The International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) has expressed deep concern over the detention and attacks against citizens protesting peacefully during Chen’s visit, describing such arrests and violence as “grave violations of human rights, under the pretext of national security.”
The FIDH has requested that the National Police Agency and National Security Bureau be held responsible for violating their legal obligations.
The FIDH has also called on the Ma administration to amend the Assembly and Parade Law, saying it is “a legacy of the martial law era.”
In particular, the group has asked the government to abolish the requirement for mandatory permits and instead adopt a system of voluntary reporting.
It also says that the clause that restricts assemblies from being held in certain areas gives the authorities too much discretion to restrict people’s freedom of association and freedom of expression.
Lin Chia-fan (林佳範), deputy chairman of the Taiwan Association for Human Rights, said the draft amendments to the Assembly and Parade Law proposed by the administration were far from perfect and his association would continue to push for more relaxed legislation.
The Executive Yuan last week approved amendments to the law that would remove the power to grant or deny protest permits from the police, but would offer them new powers to bar or alter demonstration plans in certain cases.
Lin berated the administration for taking drastic and unnecessary measures during Chen’s visit, including clearing highway lanes by force, confiscating and damaging private property and restricting the freedom of citizens’ movement.
While the police should remain politically neutral and serve the interests of the people, Lin said citizens were restricted from displaying or carrying the national flag and peacefully expressing their opinions.
“It is like we are reliving the Martial Law era,” he said. “Those who carry China’s five-star flag were left alone, but those carrying the Republic of China’s flag were harassed and even attacked. It is outright suppression of personal freedom and only shows degradation of human rights.”
Lin said Ma could have turned the demonstrations to his advantage and used them as a bargaining chip with Chen, but he decided to stand together with Chen and suppress the Taiwanese.
As the Ma administration did not respond positively to the demands of the Wild Strawberry Student Movement, students decided on Sunday to leave the Liberty Square where they staged the sit-in, he said.
Lin said that the students could learn one lesson from the month-long demonstration: A one-party government can get away with almost anything if there is no powerful opposition in place to serve as an effective check-and-balance.
“But the protest is far from over,” Lin said. “The students have started the fire and now they are spreading it. When there comes a day for them to return to the streets, they will quickly reassemble.”
SUPPRESSION OF PRESS FREEDOM
In addition to suppressing freedom of expression of citizens, journalists covering the demonstrations were assaulted and some photojournalists were pressured to help find potential suspects in the rallies during Chen’s visit.
The International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) has expressed deep concern over the detention of an independent documentary filmmaker for filming Chen in a hotel, and the assault of a television reporter by police who reportedly mistook him for a protester during the Nov. 16 rally.
In addition, the IFJ condemned the Ma administration for “apparent interference in state-owned media” and urged government authorities to refrain from intervening in personnel decisions, operations and news coverage of media outlets as doing so could jeopardize editorial independence.
The Association of Taiwan Journalists (ATJ) has denounced the restrictions and violent treatment of journalists and civilians during the protests.
The ATJ described the government’s clamp down on the media’s right to report as a “media restraint equivalent to that seen in an authoritarian regime,” saying that it seriously sabotaged Taiwan’s image as a country with free press.
ATJ chairman Leon Chuang (莊豐嘉) said that he suspected the recent slew of incidents would have a negative impact on Taiwan’s ranking of press freedom next year.
Chuang said he felt like Taiwanese society had regressed 20 years to the Martial Law era.
Back then, the KMT government was worried about the negative image martial law would bring to the country, Chuang said, but now the KMT administration does not seem to care much about public opinion.
“For a long time, Taiwan did not need to ask the international community for help in terms of human rights violations because the opposition and the local media were powerful enough to keep the government in check,” he said. “But now, things seem to have changed.”
The pressure exerted by international organizations, therefore, played a pivotal role in restraining the KMT government, Chuang said.
FLAWED JUDICIAL PROCEDURES
The rights of individuals before the law has also became an issue. A substantial number of foreign experts on Taiwan have expressed their deep concern about the recent series of detentions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politicians and urged reform in two open letters published by the Taipei Times.
They criticized the pretrial detentions as a “severe contravention of the writ of habeas corpus and a basic violation of due process, justice and the rule of law.”
They also pointed out that prosecutor’s offices “evidently leak detrimental information to the press” and this kind of “trial by press” is a violation of the basic standards of judicial procedures.
Lin Feng-cheng (林峰正), president of the Judicial Reform Foundation, said that although pretrial custody is legal in Taiwan, the damage done to the detainee’s reputation during the incarceration is difficult to restore even if the person was later proven innocent.
Lin proposed that the maximum time the accused may be detained for the purpose of investigation be reduced from four months to 20 days, as in Japan.
Such a reduction would give adequate protection to the rights of the accused while still providing reasonable time for a criminal investigation, he said.
“It would compel police and prosecutors to collect solid evidence before requesting detention,” he said. “It would make them think twice before detaining the suspect because once the 20 days are up, they must either indict or release the suspect.”
However, police and prosecutors seem to be convinced that pretrial custody is the best way to expedite indictments, Lin said, adding that some prosecutors even said they used pretrial detention as a tool to “teach the detainee a lesson.”
“It serves as a form of punishment because the living conditions at the detention center are awful,” Lin said. “Some of the inhumane treatment includes having their head shaved and being denied a hot shower for several days during the winter.”
Lin also urged the administration to establish a protocol for law enforcement personnel that would take human rights into consideration before a suspect was handcuffed.
Taipei has once again made it to the top 100 in Oxford Economics’ Global Cities Index 2025 report, moving up five places from last year to 60. The annual index, which was published last month, evaluated 1,000 of the most populated metropolises based on five indices — economics, human capital, quality of life, environment and governance. New York maintained its top spot this year, placing first in the economics index thanks to the strength of its vibrant financial industry and economic stability. Taipei ranked 263rd in economics, 44th in human capital, 15th in quality of life, 284th for environment and 75th in governance,
The Sports Administration yesterday demanded an apology from the national table tennis association for barring 17-year-old Yeh Yi-tian (葉伊恬) from competing in the upcoming World Table Tennis (WTT) United States Smash tournament in Las Vegas this July. The sports agency said in a statement that the Chinese Taipei Table Tennis Association (CTTTA) must explain to the public why it withdrew Yeh from the WTT tournament in Las Vegas. The sports agency said it contacted the association to express its disapproval of the decision-making process after receiving a complaint from Yeh’s coach, Chuang
Control Yuan Secretary-General Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) tendered his resignation last night, admitting that he had misused a government vehicle, as reported by media. His resignation was immediately accepted by the Control Yuan. In a statement explaining why he had resigned, Lee apologized for using a Control Yuan vehicle to transport his dog to a pet grooming salon on May 20. The issue first came to light late last month, when TVBS News reported that Lee had instructed his driver to take the dog to the salon. The news channel broadcast photos that it said were taken by an unnamed whistle-blower, which purportedly showed the
A former officer in China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) who witnessed the aftermath of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre has warned that Taiwan could face a similar fate if China attempts to unify the country by force. Li Xiaoming (李曉明), who was deployed to Beijing as a junior officer during the crackdown, said Taiwanese people should study the massacre carefully, because it offers a glimpse of what Beijing is willing to do to suppress dissent. “What happened in Tiananmen Square could happen in Taiwan too,” Li told CNA in a May 22 interview, ahead of the massacre’s 36th anniversary. “If Taiwanese students or
RSS