Sixty years ago this week, the UN adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the first international proclamation of the inherent dignity and equal rights of all people. To this day, the Declaration remains the single most important reference point for discussion of ethical values across national, ideological and cultural divides.
Yet the Declaration’s enlightened vision of individual freedom, social protection, economic opportunity and duty to community is still unfulfilled. Tragically, genocide is happening again, this time in Sudan. A heightened security agenda since the attacks on the US in Sept. 11, 2001, has included attempts to legitimize the use of “extraordinary rendition” — the movement between countries of prisoners and suspects without due process of law — and torture.
For women around the world, domestic violence and discrimination in employment are a daily reality. Minorities suffer stigma, discrimination and violence in developed and developing countries. The right to information is denied to millions through censorship and media intimidation.
Poverty is our greatest shame. At least 1 billion very poor people, 20 percent of humanity, are daily denied basic rights to adequate food and clean water. While gross inequalities between rich and poor persist, we cannot claim to be making adequate progress toward fulfilling the ambitions set down 60 years ago.
As we mark this anniversary, the question is how to protect the inherent dignity and equal rights of all people. A key part of the answer lies in more effective systems of accountability, so that rights are recognized and laws enforced.
NOT ENOUGH
Yet if we take a long, hard look at what has been achieved over the past six decades — and at what remains resistant to all our efforts — then it is also clear that this will not be enough.
The deepest challenges of discrimination, oppression, injustice, ignorance, exploitation and poverty cannot be addressed through the law or policy alone. If we are to make reforms sustainable and ensure that they truly protect human rights, we need effective institutions of government.
Poorly equipped or corrupt institutions are a primary obstacle to the effective protection and promotion of human rights. In recent years, billions of dollars have been invested by governments, businesses and private philanthropy in fighting poverty in poor countries. Millions of people have benefited. Yet those involved have recognized publicly that without greatly improved institutional capacity — for example, well-resourced and competent local and national health systems — further progress will be limited.
Similarly, billions of people are today unable to access or protect their legal rights because judicial and law enforcement systems are impoverished or lack integrity. Changing this will require massive investment in courts, judicial officials, police, prison systems, social ministries and parliaments, as well as in national human rights institutions and other official monitoring bodies.
Nothing on this anniversary is more important than to urge our leaders to recognize the scale of the task and commit to sustained action to build institutional capacities to protect human rights, starting in their own countries.
As world leaders race to address the current global economic crisis, it may seem unrealistic to be calling for large and long-term investments of this kind.
But, while stabilizing the international financial system is important, doing so won’t solve wider challenges of governance. Human rights cannot be realized in the absence of effective institutions. Where courts and police are corrupt, overburdened and inefficient, basic civil rights will be violated. Where social ministries are under-resourced or disempowered, basic rights to adequate healthcare, education and housing will remain unfulfilled.
Even the world’s richest nation, the US, struggles to implement much needed reforms for some of its most important social institutions — including its health and education systems.
Think how much more difficult this challenge is for the world’s developing nations. Making progress is a great test of political maturity. It is, nevertheless, essential if we are to make rights a reality for all.
COLLECTIVE EFFORT
Over the past year, as members of The Elders — a group of leaders formed under former South African president Nelson Mandela’s inspiration — we have been working with a range of partner organizations to send a human rights message to the world through the Every Human Has Rights Campaign. Thanks to this collective effort, tens of thousands of individuals — and millions more through schools, community groups, trade unions and civil society organizations — have come to identify again, or for the first time, with the goals of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
This is reason for hope. We have better tools to communicate and demand justice than any generation before us. We have global goals and shared destinies that connect us. What we need now are leadership, resources, a greater sense of urgency and commitment to the long-term efforts that must be dedicated to ensuring that the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration are not only recognized universally, but respected as well.
Mary Robinson is a former president of Ireland and a former UN high commissioner for human rights. Desmond Tutu is archbishop emeritus of Cape Town and a Nobel Peace Prize laureate. Both are members of The Elders, www.theElders.org.
COPYRIGHT: PROJECT SYNDICATE
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS