Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) visited last week to ink four deals that address direct sea and postal links, daily charter flights and food safety. Although the meeting was nominally meant to discuss cross-strait economic policy, it quickly became political.
It is difficult to believe that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) administration of Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) couldn’t see what was coming. Ma should know that a sizable percentage of Taiwan’s population viewed Chen’s arrival as yet another symbolic blow to Taiwan’s political autonomy.
Deploying 7,000 police officers over a four-day period and restricting the public’s freedom of movement were a recipe for disaster. Ma either misjudged public opinion, showing how ineffective he is as the nation’s top decision-maker, or he didn’t care about the political ramifications of his actions — at least not in Taiwan.
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) politicians, for their part, acted as if they were surprised at the violence that erupted during the protests. The DPP has known for a long time that the ARATS chairman was coming to Taiwan. That the party didn’t find some means of negotiating with the administration seems to demonstrate that it is continuing with the methods that the previous opposition suffered from — the refusal to accept the mandate of those who hold executive power.
The KMT refused to cooperate with the DPP when it was in power for eight years. But saying that this justifies unintelligent politics is as useful as saying the Ma administration can do whatever it pleases because of the perception — real or created — that the former administration of Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was corrupt. Neither does anything to help Taiwan’s evolving democratization and international status.
Taiwan’s electorate, for good or bad, chose the KMT in the last presidential and legislative elections. The DPP has to accept the fact that it no longer wields executive power and needs to work as diligently as possible within the confines of the current situation. It might not agree with how the KMT negotiates with China, but the presidential election showed that in the economic field, cross-strait liberalization is what a majority of Taiwanese want.
What Taiwanese don’t want is to be ruled by China, and it is here that the DPP has much more room to maneuver. It could, for example, have relented on cross-strait trade while suggesting an alternative location for the meeting. This would have retained all the pageantry that the KMT wanted while keeping negotiations within the economic realm.
Hindsight, of course, helps to put events in a more rational perspective. What the events of last week demonstrate is a total failure of Taiwan’s leaders to act effectively. The DPP is struggling to communicate a coherent message because it refused to work with the Ma administration, while the KMT failed because it refused to listen to voices outside the party and reverted to time-dishonored tactics reminiscent of the Martial Law era. In the end, it is Taiwanese who suffer.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under