President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) has constantly mentioned in recent interviews with media outlets that the current cross-strait talks were also promoted by the previous government under former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and thanked the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) for its past endeavors. He also said that this is a mode of cooperation between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the opposition parties.
Ma was not wrong about some things. The previous government hoped to sign a peace agreement with China, proposed establishing an interactive framework for cross-strait peace and stability and promoted cross-trait talks on 18 different issues. In addition, Taiwan successfully reached three agreements with China between January in 2005 and May this year, including two agreements on chartered flights during Lunar New Year and one agreement on special chartered flights. During this period, six rounds of negotiations on passenger and cargo chartered flights and eight rounds of talks on tourists were also held.
However, Ma was wrong about other things. There is a considerable difference between the foundation of cross-strait talks proposed by the Ma administration and those proposed by the DPP. The Chen administration insisted on Taiwan’s sovereignty and it refused to accept the so-called “1992 consensus” based on the “one China” principle as a basis for cross-strait talks. As a result, Beijing was not willing to conduct negotiations with the Chen government.
The Chen government held its stance firmly for four years and China finally gave up on the “one China” principle and was willing to conduct talks with Taiwan on issues such as chartered flights and tourism. China has constantly interfered with cross-strait talks in a political manner, limiting progress in talks for a long time. However, the Chen administration made the strategic choice to protect Taiwan’s sovereignty and interests first.
Ever since Ma took office, he has publicly accepted the “1992 consensus” and said that both sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to the greater China area. In addition, he gave up Taiwan’s UN membership bid and allowed Taiwan to apply to participate in international organizations using the title of “Chinese Taipei.” He was also willing to discuss Taiwan’s international situation with Beijing and agreed to be called “Mr Ma” by Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林). In addition, he defined cross-strait relations as “not state-to-state” relations and described Taiwan as a “region.”
The previous government never accepted principles like these. Now they have become the premises that have made China willing to negotiate with the Ma government.
Faced with much public doubt and apprehension, the Ma administration should assume responsibility for promoting the legitimacy of its cross-strait policies instead of using Chen Shui-bian as a pretext.
If Ma thinks that his policies are in line with those of the previous government and that the DPP’s doubts are groundless, then he should immediately invite DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for a talk on cross-strait issues. This would not only contribute to dispelling public doubts, but would also help the ruling and opposition parties reach a consensus and promote mutual cooperation. These are serious matters at hand and Ma should not avoid them by using his pet phrase of: “Thank you for your advice.”
Tung Chen-yuan is an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of Development Studies at National Chengchi University.
TRANSLATED BY TED YANG
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
US President Donald Trump’s alleged request that Taiwanese President William Lai (賴清德) not stop in New York while traveling to three of Taiwan’s diplomatic allies, after his administration also rescheduled a visit to Washington by the minister of national defense, sets an unwise precedent and risks locking the US into a trajectory of either direct conflict with the People’s Republic of China (PRC) or capitulation to it over Taiwan. Taiwanese authorities have said that no plans to request a stopover in the US had been submitted to Washington, but Trump shared a direct call with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平)
Heavy rains over the past week have overwhelmed southern and central Taiwan, with flooding, landslides, road closures, damage to property and the evacuations of thousands of people. Schools and offices were closed in some areas due to the deluge throughout the week. The heavy downpours brought by the southwest monsoon are a second blow to a region still recovering from last month’s Typhoon Danas. Strong winds and significant rain from the storm inflicted more than NT$2.6 billion (US$86.6 million) in agricultural losses, and damaged more than 23,000 roofs and a record high of nearly 2,500 utility poles, causing power outages. As
The greatest pressure Taiwan has faced in negotiations stems from its continuously growing trade surplus with the US. Taiwan’s trade surplus with the US reached an unprecedented high last year, surging by 54.6 percent from the previous year and placing it among the top six countries with which the US has a trade deficit. The figures became Washington’s primary reason for adopting its firm stance and demanding substantial concessions from Taipei, which put Taiwan at somewhat of a disadvantage at the negotiating table. Taiwan’s most crucial bargaining chip is undoubtedly its key position in the global semiconductor supply chain, which led
RSS