Recent reports stated that Taiwan and China have reached a consensus on routes for chartered direct cross-strait flights on weekends and that an agreement will be signed when Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) comes to Taiwan at the end of this month.
The proposed northbound route will run from Taipei’s Air Traffic Service Route B576 and include a left turn that brings planes directly to Shanghai before reaching Okinawa and Korea, which were originally transit points between Taiwan and China.
The southbound route will run via the “A1” route, and after passing along the no-fly zone in the centerline of the Taiwan Strait, will lead planes directly to Xiamen without traveling via Hong Kong.
As soon as these more direct routes are established, the R8 no-fly zone located at the northern point of the centerline in the Taiwan Strait, which has been in place for 50 years, will cease to exist.
This will not only affect the vigilance of Taiwan’s armed forces, but will also produce a gap in air defenses in the north. The changes will dramatically lessen the amount of air space that Taiwan’s military can use for maneuvers, which will be detrimental to overall defense capabilities.
These routes are extremely close to the Taiwan Strait centerline, originally drawn up by the US.
Not long after President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) came to power, China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) changed the Russian-made S-300PMU 1and 2 surface-to-air missile systems, with a range of 80km to 120km, in the coastal areas of Xiamen, Longtian and Shantou to the S-300PMU3, with a range of more than 200km, which means that all of Taiwan’s airspace is now within range of Chinese missiles.
This poses a great danger to Taiwan, because even if radar detected a Chinese “Trojan-horse strategy” — whereby an attack was launched by hiding fighter aircraft under the wings of civilian aircraft — the first target to be hit would be the civilian planes, placing huge pressure on a commander’s willingness to issue the order.
Some say that talk of a Trojan-horse attack is unfounded. However, war is based on surprise and strategy.
If China is not considering such a strategy, why did it stage an exercise just before direct chartered flights commenced that involved troops in civilian aircraft taking over an airport? Because the PLA had nothing better to do? I seriously doubt that.
When the Democratic Progressive Party was in power, there were plans to establish an air identification zone in Okinawa. Having and using identification procedures in a third, neutral country can better secure safety and security.
But the routes now under discussion leave out third country identification zones, turning them into domestic routes.
This would not only erode Taiwanese sovereignty, but would also show that the Ma administration has no regard for national security.
If the government is so hell-bent on selling out the nation, why doesn’t it close down the Ministry of National Defense and be done with it?
Chen Kuo-hsiung is the general-secretary of the Taiwan National Security Institute.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS